Know the name, forget the exposure: Brand familiarity versus memory of exposure context

Stephen J S Holden*, Marc Vanhuele

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research shows that a single auditory exposure to fictitious brand names may create the impression, one day later, that these brand names actually exist. It appears that the judgment that the brands are known is based on brand familiarity coupled with a failure to remember the exposure context. This demonstration, inspired by the false fame effect, is interpreted as the product of an implicit memory process. The result implies that measurement of explicit memory of an ad or other marketing communication may misrepresent (in this case, understate) the influence of that communication. However, the effect was obtained only when attention to the fictitious brand names was deliberate (as opposed to incidental). This suggests that there are lower attentional limits to the influence of one exposure to a brand name on creating familiarity without memory of the exposure context.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)479-496
Number of pages18
JournalPsychology and Marketing
Volume16
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Sep 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Know the name, forget the exposure: Brand familiarity versus memory of exposure context'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this