Abstract
Reductive intellectualists (e.g., Stanley & Williamson 2001; Stanley 2011a; 2011b; Brogaard 2008b; 2009; 2011) hold that knowledge-how is a kind of knowledge-that. For this thesis to hold water, it is obviously important that knowledge-how and knowledge-that have the same epistemic properties. In particular, knowledge-how ought to be compatible with epistemic luck to the same extent as knowledge-that. It is argued, contra reductive intellectualism, that knowledge-how is compatible with a species of epistemic luck which is not compatible with knowledge-that, and thus it is claimed that knowledge-how and knowledge-that come apart.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 440-453 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Nous |
Volume | 49 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Sept 2015 |
Externally published | Yes |