TY - JOUR
T1 - Language abilities in Williams syndrome
T2 - A critical review
AU - Brock, Jon
N1 - Copyright 2007 Cambridge University Press. Article originally published in Development and psychopathology, Vol. 97, Issue 1, pp.97-127. The original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S095457940707006X.
PY - 2007/1
Y1 - 2007/1
N2 - Williams syndrome is a rare genetic disorder in which, it is claimed, language abilities are relatively strong despite mild to moderate mental retardation. Such claims have, in turn, been interpreted as evidence either for modular preservation of language or for atypical constraints on cognitive development. However, this review demonstrates that there is, in fact, little evidence that syntax, morphology, phonology, or pragmatics are any better than predicted by nonverbal ability, although performance on receptive vocabulary tests is relatively good. Similarly, claims of an imbalance between good phonology and impaired or atypical lexical semantics are without strong support. There is, nevertheless, consistent evidence for specific deficits in spatial language that mirror difficulties in nonverbal spatial cognition, as well as some tentative evidence that early language acquisition proceeds atypically. Implications for modular and neuroconstructivist accounts of language development are discussed.
AB - Williams syndrome is a rare genetic disorder in which, it is claimed, language abilities are relatively strong despite mild to moderate mental retardation. Such claims have, in turn, been interpreted as evidence either for modular preservation of language or for atypical constraints on cognitive development. However, this review demonstrates that there is, in fact, little evidence that syntax, morphology, phonology, or pragmatics are any better than predicted by nonverbal ability, although performance on receptive vocabulary tests is relatively good. Similarly, claims of an imbalance between good phonology and impaired or atypical lexical semantics are without strong support. There is, nevertheless, consistent evidence for specific deficits in spatial language that mirror difficulties in nonverbal spatial cognition, as well as some tentative evidence that early language acquisition proceeds atypically. Implications for modular and neuroconstructivist accounts of language development are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947404469&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S095457940707006X
DO - 10.1017/S095457940707006X
M3 - Review article
C2 - 17241486
AN - SCOPUS:33947404469
SN - 0954-5794
VL - 19
SP - 97
EP - 127
JO - Development and Psychopathology
JF - Development and Psychopathology
IS - 1
ER -