Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lateralization of interaural time differences with mixed rates of stimulation in bilateral cochlear implant listeners

Tanvi Thakkar*, Alan Kan, Ruth Y. Litovsky

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

While listeners with bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) are able to access information in both ears, they still struggle to perform well on spatial hearing tasks when compared to normal hearing listeners. This performance gap could be attributed to the high stimulation rates used for speech representation in clinical processors. Prior work has shown that spatial cues, such as interaural time differences (ITDs), are best conveyed at low rates. Further, BiCI listeners are sensitive to ITDs with a mixture of high and low rates. However, it remains unclear whether mixed-rate stimuli are perceived as unitary percepts and spatially mapped to intracranial locations. Here, electrical pulse trains were presented on five, interaurally pitch-matched electrode pairs using research processors, at either uniformly high rates, low rates, or mixed rates. Eight post-lingually deafened adults were tested on perceived intracranial lateralization of ITDs ranging from 50 to 1600 μs. Extent of lateralization depended on the location of low-rate stimulation along the electrode array: greatest in the low- and mixed-rate configurations, and smallest in the high-rate configuration. All but one listener perceived a unitary auditory object. These findings suggest that a mixed-rate processing strategy can result in good lateralization and convey a unitary auditory object with ITDs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1912-1923
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume153
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Lateralization of interaural time differences with mixed rates of stimulation in bilateral cochlear implant listeners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this