TY - JOUR
T1 - Legal malpractice lawsuits in Japan
T2 - past, present and future
AU - Chan, Kay Wah
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Until recently, Japan has been known for its small number of lawyers (bengoshi). Aggrieved clients also rarely brought lawsuits against their bengoshi for malpractice. However, in 2001, Japan embarked on a sweeping reform of its legal system. As a result, the number of bengoshi dramatically increased. However, there are claims that there has been a decline in the quality of the new generation of bengoshi and that legal malpractice lawsuits are increasing. Is this really the case and, if so, will there be a crisis in the near future? To explore these questions, this paper will analyse the factors that arguably contribute to the hitherto small number of legal malpractice lawsuits in Japan and then examine whether any of these contributory factors has changed or will change and whether such change (if any) will cause a substantial increase in legal malpractice lawsuits and a crisis in the near future.
AB - Until recently, Japan has been known for its small number of lawyers (bengoshi). Aggrieved clients also rarely brought lawsuits against their bengoshi for malpractice. However, in 2001, Japan embarked on a sweeping reform of its legal system. As a result, the number of bengoshi dramatically increased. However, there are claims that there has been a decline in the quality of the new generation of bengoshi and that legal malpractice lawsuits are increasing. Is this really the case and, if so, will there be a crisis in the near future? To explore these questions, this paper will analyse the factors that arguably contribute to the hitherto small number of legal malpractice lawsuits in Japan and then examine whether any of these contributory factors has changed or will change and whether such change (if any) will cause a substantial increase in legal malpractice lawsuits and a crisis in the near future.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994632242&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09695958.2016.1247709
DO - 10.1080/09695958.2016.1247709
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84994632242
SN - 0969-5958
VL - 24
SP - 159
EP - 176
JO - International Journal of the Legal Profession
JF - International Journal of the Legal Profession
IS - 2
ER -