Abstract
In Australia, urbanisation is synonymous with ecological and cultural fragmentation. In places that became cities through deeply colonising processes, this destruction is imbricated with the relegation of Indigenous Lore/Law below English-derived law. In this article we argue for appropriate recognition and respectful intercultural engagements with Country-as-Lore/Law as a counter to the conception of land as a passive subject of anthropocentric law. Weaving together autoethnography, historical research and more-than-human geographies we identify the colonial practices that perpetuate ecological and cultural fragmentation in Sydney, Australia, while providing a novel, situated engagement with the humans, animals, plants, lands and waters that co-become to co-create particular and overlapping more-than-human legal landscapes. We show how Indigenous-non-Indigenous collaboration grounded in Darug Country-as-Lore/Law refracts and disperses the colonial logics of the state on urban Country that is ostensibly held, yet certainly neglected, by the Crown.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 355-379 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Geohumanities |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 12 Apr 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- decolonising
- indigenous-led collaboration
- legal geographies
- more-than-human cities
- ontological pluralism
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Legal pluralism on Dyarubbin: Country-as-Lore/Law in Western Sydney, Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver