Abstract
Laws that restrict access to reproductive technology and fail to
adequately recognise parent-child relationships in lesbian/gay
families detrimentally affect not only individual lesbians and gay
men interested in parenting, but the broader lesbian and gay
community. On the one hand these laws, as they currently stand
in much of Australia, are complicit in maintaining the closet,
inarticulation and silence as defining features of lesbian and gay
lives. On the other hand, they contribute to the construction of all
lesbians and gay men as non-familial and anti-family. Representations of lesbians and gay men along these lines have traditionally been central to the construction of lesbian and gay identity in Australia, as revealed by a survey of queer-themed Australian works of literature and popular fiction. If improving the status of lesbians and gay men in heteronormative societies depends on destabilising identity categories, practices that contribute to maintaining the integrity of lesbian and gay identity should be targeted for change. Reforming laws on reproduction and parenting should then be a priority for lesbians and gay men, even those who do not wish to have children.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 107-130 |
Number of pages | 24 |
Journal | Griffith Law Review |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2007 |