Lexical access by L1 and L2 mono- and bidialectal listeners

Anita Szakay; Ksenia Gnevsheva; Sandra Jansen

Lexical access by L1 and L2 mono- and bidialectal listeners

Anita Szakay, Ksenia Gnevsheva, Sandra Jansen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference proceeding contribution › peer-review

Abstract

This paper investigates lexical access in English in 36 listeners from four different participant groups. The groups vary in English language background (L1 vs. L2 [native Russian]), and in terms of English dialect exposure (D1 [monodialectal Australian] vs. D2 [bidialectal American / Australian]), providing the four groups: L1D1, L1D2, L2D1, and L2D2. We analyze accuracy in a lexical decision task in terms of the lexical item’s dialect origin (e.g. American faucet vs. Australian tap), and the speaker’s accent (Australian vs. American). Results reveal that L1 lexical decision is significantly more accurate on items with congruent word dialect and speaker accent (e.g. faucet in an American rather than Australian accent) than on incongruent ones. However, (in)congruency has no significant effect on accuracy during L2 lexical decision.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences
Subtitle of host publication	ICPhS2019
Editors	Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain, Paul Warren
Place of Publication	Canberra
Publisher	Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association (ASSTA)
Pages	3245-3249
Number of pages	5
ISBN (Electronic)	9780646800691
Publication status	Published - 2019
Event	International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (19th : 2019) - Melbourne, Australia Duration: 5 Aug 2019 → 9 Aug 2019

Conference

Conference	International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (19th : 2019)
Abbreviated title	ICPhS2019
Country	Australia
City	Melbourne
Period	5/08/19 → 9/08/19

Keywords

perception
bidialectalism
second dialect acquisition
second language acquisition

Access to Document

https://assta.org/proceedings/ICPhS2019/papers/ICPhS_3294.pdfLicence: Unspecified
Full proceedings

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Lexical access by L1 and L2 mono- and bidialectal listeners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Szakay, A., Gnevsheva, K., & Jansen, S. (2019). Lexical access by L1 and L2 mono- and bidialectal listeners. In S. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain, & P. Warren (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences: ICPhS2019 (pp. 3245-3249). Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association (ASSTA). https://assta.org/proceedings/ICPhS2019/papers/ICPhS_3294.pdf

@inproceedings{b3e6834c48db4d4c8ee42b3dc5a5a013,

title = "Lexical access by L1 and L2 mono- and bidialectal listeners",

abstract = "This paper investigates lexical access in English in 36 listeners from four different participant groups. The groups vary in English language background (L1 vs. L2 [native Russian]), and in terms of English dialect exposure (D1 [monodialectal Australian] vs. D2 [bidialectal American / Australian]), providing the four groups: L1D1, L1D2, L2D1, and L2D2. We analyze accuracy in a lexical decision task in terms of the lexical item{\textquoteright}s dialect origin (e.g. American faucet vs. Australian tap), and the speaker{\textquoteright}s accent (Australian vs. American). Results reveal that L1 lexical decision is significantly more accurate on items with congruent word dialect and speaker accent (e.g. faucet in an American rather than Australian accent) than on incongruent ones. However, (in)congruency has no significant effect on accuracy during L2 lexical decision.",

keywords = "perception, bidialectalism, second dialect acquisition, second language acquisition",

author = "Anita Szakay and Ksenia Gnevsheva and Sandra Jansen",

year = "2019",

language = "English",

pages = "3245--3249",

editor = "Sasha Calhoun and Paola Escudero and Marija Tabain and Paul Warren",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences",

publisher = "Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association (ASSTA)",

note = "International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (19th : 2019), ICPhS2019 ; Conference date: 05-08-2019 Through 09-08-2019",

}

Szakay, A, Gnevsheva, K & Jansen, S 2019, Lexical access by L1 and L2 mono- and bidialectal listeners. in S Calhoun, P Escudero, M Tabain & P Warren (eds), Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences: ICPhS2019. Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association (ASSTA), Canberra, pp. 3245-3249, International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (19th : 2019), Melbourne, Australia, 5/08/19. <https://assta.org/proceedings/ICPhS2019/papers/ICPhS_3294.pdf>

Lexical access by L1 and L2 mono- and bidialectal listeners. / Szakay, Anita; Gnevsheva, Ksenia; Jansen, Sandra.

Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences: ICPhS2019. ed. / Sasha Calhoun; Paola Escudero; Marija Tabain; Paul Warren. Canberra : Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association (ASSTA), 2019. p. 3245-3249.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference proceeding contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Lexical access by L1 and L2 mono- and bidialectal listeners

AU - Szakay, Anita

AU - Gnevsheva, Ksenia

AU - Jansen, Sandra

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This paper investigates lexical access in English in 36 listeners from four different participant groups. The groups vary in English language background (L1 vs. L2 [native Russian]), and in terms of English dialect exposure (D1 [monodialectal Australian] vs. D2 [bidialectal American / Australian]), providing the four groups: L1D1, L1D2, L2D1, and L2D2. We analyze accuracy in a lexical decision task in terms of the lexical item’s dialect origin (e.g. American faucet vs. Australian tap), and the speaker’s accent (Australian vs. American). Results reveal that L1 lexical decision is significantly more accurate on items with congruent word dialect and speaker accent (e.g. faucet in an American rather than Australian accent) than on incongruent ones. However, (in)congruency has no significant effect on accuracy during L2 lexical decision.

AB - This paper investigates lexical access in English in 36 listeners from four different participant groups. The groups vary in English language background (L1 vs. L2 [native Russian]), and in terms of English dialect exposure (D1 [monodialectal Australian] vs. D2 [bidialectal American / Australian]), providing the four groups: L1D1, L1D2, L2D1, and L2D2. We analyze accuracy in a lexical decision task in terms of the lexical item’s dialect origin (e.g. American faucet vs. Australian tap), and the speaker’s accent (Australian vs. American). Results reveal that L1 lexical decision is significantly more accurate on items with congruent word dialect and speaker accent (e.g. faucet in an American rather than Australian accent) than on incongruent ones. However, (in)congruency has no significant effect on accuracy during L2 lexical decision.

KW - perception

KW - bidialectalism

KW - second dialect acquisition

KW - second language acquisition

UR - https://assta.org/proceedings/ICPhS2019/?fbclid=IwAR27WLm9moSk-49QByCow1UrtmqG0lDBIN1Yu0GL5fUBtV5vyUB89NRc8A0

M3 - Conference proceeding contribution

SP - 3245

EP - 3249

BT - Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences

A2 - Calhoun, Sasha

A2 - Escudero, Paola

A2 - Tabain, Marija

A2 - Warren, Paul

PB - Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association (ASSTA)

CY - Canberra

T2 - International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (19th : 2019)

Y2 - 5 August 2019 through 9 August 2019

ER -