Lifetime return on investment increases with leaf lifespan among 10 Australian woodland species

Daniel S. Falster*, Peter B. Reich, David S. Ellsworth, Ian J. Wright, Mark Westoby, Jacek Oleksyn, Tali D. Lee

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)


• Co-occurring species often differ in their leaf lifespan (LL) and it remains unclear how such variation is maintained in a competitive context. Here we test the hypothesis that leaves of long-LL species yield a greater return in carbon (C) fixed per unit C or nutrient invested by the plant than those of short-LL species. • For 10 sympatric woodland species, we assessed three-dimensional shoot architecture, canopy openness, leaf photosynthetic light response, leaf dark respiration and leaf construction costs across leaf age sequences. We then used the YPLANT model to estimate light interception and C revenue along the measured leaf age sequences. This was done under a series of simulations that incorporated the potential covariates of LL in an additive fashion. • Lifetime return in C fixed per unit C, N or P invested increased with LL in all simulations. • In contrast to other recent studies, our results show that extended LL confers a fundamental economic advantage by increasing a plant's return on investment in leaves. This suggests that time-discounting effects, that is, the compounding of income that arises from quick reinvestment of C revenue, are key in allowing short-LL species to succeed in the face of this economic handicap.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)409-419
Number of pages11
JournalNew Phytologist
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012


Dive into the research topics of 'Lifetime return on investment increases with leaf lifespan among 10 Australian woodland species'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this