Linking clinical quality indicators to research evidence - a case study in asthma management for children

Miew Keen Choong, Guy Tsafnat, Peter Hibbert, William B. Runciman, Enrico Coiera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Clinical quality indicators are used to monitor the performance of healthcare services and should wherever possible be based on research evidence. Little is known however about the extent to which indicators in common use are based on research. The objective of this study is to measure the extent to which clinical quality indicators used in asthma management in children with outcome measurements can be linked to results in randomised controlled clinical trial (RCT) reports. This work is part of a broader research program to trial methods that improve the efficiency and accuracy of indicator development. Methods: National-level indicators for asthma management in children were extracted from the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse database and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence quality standards by two independent appraisers. Outcome measures were extracted from all published English language RCT reports for asthma management in children below the age of 12 published between 2005 and 2014. The two sets were then linked by manually mapping both to a common set of Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) concepts. Results: The analysis identified 39 indicators and 562 full text RCTs dealing with asthma management in children. About 95% (37/39) of the indicators could be linked to RCT outcome measures. Conclusions: It is possible to identify relevant RCT reports for the majority of indicators used to assess the quality of asthma management in childhood. The methods reported here could be automated to more generally support assessment of candidate indicators against the research evidence.

LanguageEnglish
Article number502
Pages1-7
Number of pages7
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Asthma
Randomized Controlled Trials
Research
Unified Medical Language System
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Delivery of Health Care
National Institutes of Health (U.S.)
Language
Databases

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2017. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • asthma
  • child
  • outcome measures
  • quality indicators
  • randomised controlled trial

Cite this

@article{6b4c5769d4e547b2a7230072f2087d62,
title = "Linking clinical quality indicators to research evidence - a case study in asthma management for children",
abstract = "Background: Clinical quality indicators are used to monitor the performance of healthcare services and should wherever possible be based on research evidence. Little is known however about the extent to which indicators in common use are based on research. The objective of this study is to measure the extent to which clinical quality indicators used in asthma management in children with outcome measurements can be linked to results in randomised controlled clinical trial (RCT) reports. This work is part of a broader research program to trial methods that improve the efficiency and accuracy of indicator development. Methods: National-level indicators for asthma management in children were extracted from the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse database and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence quality standards by two independent appraisers. Outcome measures were extracted from all published English language RCT reports for asthma management in children below the age of 12 published between 2005 and 2014. The two sets were then linked by manually mapping both to a common set of Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) concepts. Results: The analysis identified 39 indicators and 562 full text RCTs dealing with asthma management in children. About 95{\%} (37/39) of the indicators could be linked to RCT outcome measures. Conclusions: It is possible to identify relevant RCT reports for the majority of indicators used to assess the quality of asthma management in childhood. The methods reported here could be automated to more generally support assessment of candidate indicators against the research evidence.",
keywords = "asthma, child, outcome measures, quality indicators, randomised controlled trial",
author = "Choong, {Miew Keen} and Guy Tsafnat and Peter Hibbert and Runciman, {William B.} and Enrico Coiera",
note = "Copyright the Author(s) 2017. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1186/s12913-017-2324-y",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "Springer, Springer Nature",

}

Linking clinical quality indicators to research evidence - a case study in asthma management for children. / Choong, Miew Keen; Tsafnat, Guy; Hibbert, Peter; Runciman, William B.; Coiera, Enrico.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 17, 502, 21.07.2017, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking clinical quality indicators to research evidence - a case study in asthma management for children

AU - Choong, Miew Keen

AU - Tsafnat, Guy

AU - Hibbert, Peter

AU - Runciman, William B.

AU - Coiera, Enrico

N1 - Copyright the Author(s) 2017. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

PY - 2017/7/21

Y1 - 2017/7/21

N2 - Background: Clinical quality indicators are used to monitor the performance of healthcare services and should wherever possible be based on research evidence. Little is known however about the extent to which indicators in common use are based on research. The objective of this study is to measure the extent to which clinical quality indicators used in asthma management in children with outcome measurements can be linked to results in randomised controlled clinical trial (RCT) reports. This work is part of a broader research program to trial methods that improve the efficiency and accuracy of indicator development. Methods: National-level indicators for asthma management in children were extracted from the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse database and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence quality standards by two independent appraisers. Outcome measures were extracted from all published English language RCT reports for asthma management in children below the age of 12 published between 2005 and 2014. The two sets were then linked by manually mapping both to a common set of Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) concepts. Results: The analysis identified 39 indicators and 562 full text RCTs dealing with asthma management in children. About 95% (37/39) of the indicators could be linked to RCT outcome measures. Conclusions: It is possible to identify relevant RCT reports for the majority of indicators used to assess the quality of asthma management in childhood. The methods reported here could be automated to more generally support assessment of candidate indicators against the research evidence.

AB - Background: Clinical quality indicators are used to monitor the performance of healthcare services and should wherever possible be based on research evidence. Little is known however about the extent to which indicators in common use are based on research. The objective of this study is to measure the extent to which clinical quality indicators used in asthma management in children with outcome measurements can be linked to results in randomised controlled clinical trial (RCT) reports. This work is part of a broader research program to trial methods that improve the efficiency and accuracy of indicator development. Methods: National-level indicators for asthma management in children were extracted from the National Quality Measures Clearinghouse database and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence quality standards by two independent appraisers. Outcome measures were extracted from all published English language RCT reports for asthma management in children below the age of 12 published between 2005 and 2014. The two sets were then linked by manually mapping both to a common set of Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) concepts. Results: The analysis identified 39 indicators and 562 full text RCTs dealing with asthma management in children. About 95% (37/39) of the indicators could be linked to RCT outcome measures. Conclusions: It is possible to identify relevant RCT reports for the majority of indicators used to assess the quality of asthma management in childhood. The methods reported here could be automated to more generally support assessment of candidate indicators against the research evidence.

KW - asthma

KW - child

KW - outcome measures

KW - quality indicators

KW - randomised controlled trial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025163470&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12913-017-2324-y

DO - 10.1186/s12913-017-2324-y

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - BMC Health Services Research

T2 - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

M1 - 502

ER -