Abstract
Objective: To assess test-retest reliability of the Listening in Spatialized Noise –Universal test (LiSN-U).
Design: Test-retest reliability study. Participants completed the LiSN-U twice, four to eight weeks apart.
Study Sample: Test-retest reliability was analysed for 23 adults and 109 children.
Results: ANOVA showed significant group average score improvement on LiSN-Uspatially-separated and co-located conditions on retest (by 1.3 and 0.9 dB respectively), but not on the difference between them (spatial advantage). Critical difference scores for children were -3.6 dB for the spatially-separated condition, -5.8 dB for the co-located condition, and 5.5 dB for spatial advantage. Critical difference scores for adults were -2.0 dB for the spatially-separated condition, -4.9 dB for the co-located condition, and 5.4 dB for spatial advantage. A correlation analysis was run to determine the relationship between test and retest speech reception thresholds. The correlation was r = 0.63, p < 0.001 for the spatially-separated condition, r = 0.50, p < 0.001 for the co-located condition, and r = 0.37, p < 0.001 for the spatial advantage measure.
Conclusions: The LiSN-U, which is potentially useable for speakers of any language, shows mean test-retest difference and test-retest reliability comparable to other tests that have proven useful in clinical practice.
Design: Test-retest reliability study. Participants completed the LiSN-U twice, four to eight weeks apart.
Study Sample: Test-retest reliability was analysed for 23 adults and 109 children.
Results: ANOVA showed significant group average score improvement on LiSN-Uspatially-separated and co-located conditions on retest (by 1.3 and 0.9 dB respectively), but not on the difference between them (spatial advantage). Critical difference scores for children were -3.6 dB for the spatially-separated condition, -5.8 dB for the co-located condition, and 5.5 dB for spatial advantage. Critical difference scores for adults were -2.0 dB for the spatially-separated condition, -4.9 dB for the co-located condition, and 5.4 dB for spatial advantage. A correlation analysis was run to determine the relationship between test and retest speech reception thresholds. The correlation was r = 0.63, p < 0.001 for the spatially-separated condition, r = 0.50, p < 0.001 for the co-located condition, and r = 0.37, p < 0.001 for the spatial advantage measure.
Conclusions: The LiSN-U, which is potentially useable for speakers of any language, shows mean test-retest difference and test-retest reliability comparable to other tests that have proven useful in clinical practice.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 75-80 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | International Journal of Audiology |
Volume | 60 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 27 Jul 2020 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2021 |
Keywords
- spatial processing disorder
- central auditory processing disorders
- test-retest reliability
- speech perception