Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Longitudinal visual biomarkers in Dominant Optic Atrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Christopher A. Ovens*, John R. Grigg, Clare L. Fraser

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Dominant Optic Atrophy (DOA) causes slowly progressive visual decline usually beginning in childhood. As new therapies come to clinical trial, the choice of biomarkers to be used as clinical trial endpoints has become a critical question to be addressed. Methods: We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting longitudinal data of any biomarker in DOA patients. Results: In total, seven studies were included in the systematic review, and four presented paired results compatible with meta-analysis. Visual acuity was the only biomarker found with reported longitudinal data. Of the included studies in the meta-analysis, the rate of yearly visual acuity decline (0.022 LogMAR/year., 95% CI: −0.008 to 0.052) was not significantly different from zero (Z = 1.4, p = 0.155). Conclusion: Quantifying this slow rate of visual decline has implications for future study design and suggests that further natural history studies examining alternative biomarkers in DOA are warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)652-659
Number of pages8
JournalClinical and Experimental Ophthalmology
Volume53
Issue number6
Early online date7 May 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2025. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • autosomal dominant optic atrophy
  • biomarkers
  • review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Longitudinal visual biomarkers in Dominant Optic Atrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this