Lost paradigm: the fate of work in post-war French philosophy

Jean Philippe Deranty*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)


For a brief period, between the years immediately preceding the Second World War and for about a decade thereafter, the most important authors in French philosophy (Weil, Merleau-Ponty, Sartre) conducted their reflections within a “work paradigm”, that is, within theoretical frameworks in which the concept of work played the central, organising role. The first three sections of the paper identify the different meanings of work, which, brought together under the umbrella concept of “praxis”, underpinned this paradigm. The central claim advanced by the paper in section 4 is that the rise of a new paradigm in the following generation of French philosophy (Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze), around the concepts of structure, text and discourse, was explicitly directed against work. In the final section I identify a “return to work” in French philosophy (notably via Rancière), brought about, I argue, by the problematic severing of theory and practice that is inherent in structuralist methods.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-511
Number of pages21
JournalRevue Internationale de Philosophie
Issue number278
Publication statusPublished - 2016


Dive into the research topics of 'Lost paradigm: the fate of work in post-war French philosophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this