Love thy neighbour or opposites attract? Patterns of spatial segregation and association among crested penguin populations during winter

Norman Ratcliffe*, Sarah Crofts, Ruth Brown, Alastair M M Baylis, Stacey Adlard, Catharine Horswill, Hugh Venables, Phil Taylor, Philip N. Trathan, Iain J. Staniland

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Citations (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aim: Competition for food among populations of closely related species and conspecifics that occur in both sympatry and parapatry can be reduced by interspecific and intraspecific spatial segregation. According to predictions of niche partitioning, segregation is expected to occur at habitat boundaries among congeners and within habitats among conspecifics, while negative relationships in the density of species or populations will occur in areas of overlap. We tested these predictions by modelling the winter distributions of two crested penguin species from three colonies in the south-western Atlantic. Location: Penguins were tracked from two large colonies on the Falkland Islands and one in South Georgia, from where they dispersed through the South Atlantic, Southern Ocean and south-eastern Pacific. Methods: Forty macaroni penguins (Eudyptes chrysolophus) from South Georgia and 82 southern rockhopper penguins (Eudyptes chrysocome chrysocome) from two colonies in the Falkland Islands were equipped with global location sensors which log time and light, allowing positions to be estimated twice-daily, from April to August in 2011. Positions were gridded and converted into maps of penguin density. Metrics of overlap were calculated and density was related to remote-sensed oceanographic variables and competitor density using generalized additive models. Results: Macaroni penguins from western South Georgia and southern rockhopper penguins from Steeple Jason Island, Falkland Islands, were spatially segregated by differences in their habitat preferences thus supporting our first prediction regarding interspecific segregation. However, southern rockhopper penguins from Beauchêne Island showed a marked spatial overlap with macaroni penguins as the two had similar habitat preferences and strong mutual associations when controlling for habitat. Contrary to our predictions relating to intraspecific segregation, southern rockhopper penguins from Beauchêne Island and Steeple Jason Island were segregated by differences in habitat selection. Main conclusions: Morphological differentiation probably allows macaroni penguins from South Georgia and southern rockhopper penguins from Beauchêne Island to coexist in areas of spatial overlap, whereas segregation of the two Falkland rockhopper penguin populations may have arisen from two distinct lineages retaining cultural fidelity to ancestral wintering areas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1183-1192
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Biogeography
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2014
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2014. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Keywords

  • Eudyptes
  • Falkland Islands
  • Geolocation
  • Habitat selection
  • Niche partitioning
  • Penguin
  • South Georgia
  • Spatial segregation
  • Winter distribution

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Love thy neighbour or opposites attract? Patterns of spatial segregation and association among crested penguin populations during winter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this