Lucien Febvre and the study of religious history

Bruce E. Mansfield

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

There is a better and a worse way of discussing the methodology of a historian. The worse is to lay out his ideas on method in a purely abstract way, enlist him in a school and submit him to some pattern or other of the ‘history of history’. This is the easier way; it is attractive to undergraduates, not least because it can reduce the life’s work of a great and subtle mind to a few simple-and often ridiculous propositions. The better way is to follow him in the exploration of an actual historical landscape, to observe him at his first setting out and at the dusty work itself, to see what resources he can call on when the terrain is difficult. A historian of the resonance of Lucien Febvre deserves to be approached in this way. For nearly two generations he was a goad to fresh thought about the methods of historians and has left numerous methodological essays. But his force can be measured only in his true historical work, in his writings on the religious history of the sixteenth century. Many of his essays on this subject have been posthumously published in Au Coeur religieux du XVI esiecle (Paris, 1957). In this article we will proceed from a discussion of the quality and achievement of this work to consider the principles of method which made it possible.
LanguageEnglish
Pages102-111
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Religious History
Volume1
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1960

Fingerprint

Religious History
Historian
History
Undergraduate
Methodology
Layout
Thought
Resources

Cite this

Mansfield, Bruce E. / Lucien Febvre and the study of religious history. In: Journal of Religious History. 1960 ; Vol. 1, No. 2. pp. 102-111.
@article{36025cf4627c43e9975564f3d671dcf2,
title = "Lucien Febvre and the study of religious history",
abstract = "There is a better and a worse way of discussing the methodology of a historian. The worse is to lay out his ideas on method in a purely abstract way, enlist him in a school and submit him to some pattern or other of the ‘history of history’. This is the easier way; it is attractive to undergraduates, not least because it can reduce the life’s work of a great and subtle mind to a few simple-and often ridiculous propositions. The better way is to follow him in the exploration of an actual historical landscape, to observe him at his first setting out and at the dusty work itself, to see what resources he can call on when the terrain is difficult. A historian of the resonance of Lucien Febvre deserves to be approached in this way. For nearly two generations he was a goad to fresh thought about the methods of historians and has left numerous methodological essays. But his force can be measured only in his true historical work, in his writings on the religious history of the sixteenth century. Many of his essays on this subject have been posthumously published in Au Coeur religieux du XVI esiecle (Paris, 1957). In this article we will proceed from a discussion of the quality and achievement of this work to consider the principles of method which made it possible.",
author = "Mansfield, {Bruce E.}",
year = "1960",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9809.1960.tb00018.x",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "102--111",
journal = "Journal of Religious History",
issn = "1467-9809",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "2",

}

Lucien Febvre and the study of religious history. / Mansfield, Bruce E.

In: Journal of Religious History, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1960, p. 102-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lucien Febvre and the study of religious history

AU - Mansfield, Bruce E.

PY - 1960

Y1 - 1960

N2 - There is a better and a worse way of discussing the methodology of a historian. The worse is to lay out his ideas on method in a purely abstract way, enlist him in a school and submit him to some pattern or other of the ‘history of history’. This is the easier way; it is attractive to undergraduates, not least because it can reduce the life’s work of a great and subtle mind to a few simple-and often ridiculous propositions. The better way is to follow him in the exploration of an actual historical landscape, to observe him at his first setting out and at the dusty work itself, to see what resources he can call on when the terrain is difficult. A historian of the resonance of Lucien Febvre deserves to be approached in this way. For nearly two generations he was a goad to fresh thought about the methods of historians and has left numerous methodological essays. But his force can be measured only in his true historical work, in his writings on the religious history of the sixteenth century. Many of his essays on this subject have been posthumously published in Au Coeur religieux du XVI esiecle (Paris, 1957). In this article we will proceed from a discussion of the quality and achievement of this work to consider the principles of method which made it possible.

AB - There is a better and a worse way of discussing the methodology of a historian. The worse is to lay out his ideas on method in a purely abstract way, enlist him in a school and submit him to some pattern or other of the ‘history of history’. This is the easier way; it is attractive to undergraduates, not least because it can reduce the life’s work of a great and subtle mind to a few simple-and often ridiculous propositions. The better way is to follow him in the exploration of an actual historical landscape, to observe him at his first setting out and at the dusty work itself, to see what resources he can call on when the terrain is difficult. A historian of the resonance of Lucien Febvre deserves to be approached in this way. For nearly two generations he was a goad to fresh thought about the methods of historians and has left numerous methodological essays. But his force can be measured only in his true historical work, in his writings on the religious history of the sixteenth century. Many of his essays on this subject have been posthumously published in Au Coeur religieux du XVI esiecle (Paris, 1957). In this article we will proceed from a discussion of the quality and achievement of this work to consider the principles of method which made it possible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980127610&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9809.1960.tb00018.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9809.1960.tb00018.x

M3 - Review article

VL - 1

SP - 102

EP - 111

JO - Journal of Religious History

T2 - Journal of Religious History

JF - Journal of Religious History

SN - 1467-9809

IS - 2

ER -