Abstract
In his paper published in this issue, Ishtiyaque Haji argues that the challenge to compatibilism from luck is not novel. Rather, the challenge is identical to that from manipulation cases, and compatibilists already have responses to that challenge. In response, I distinguish two different luck problems for compatibilism. One challenge is seen in manipulation cases, but the challenge he identifies is different from the challenge from manipulation. The luck problem is therefore novel, and the existing solutions to the challenge from manipulation fail to address it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 633-646 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Dialogue-Canadian Philosophical Review |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2015 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Luck and Manipulation Cases: A Response to Professor Haji'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver