Macquarie University, Australia

Juliet Lum*, Alice Chik

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The case study chapter from Australia reports on interviews with seasoned examiners from Macquarie University, a public, metropolitan university in Sydney. It highlights several distinctive characteristics in PhD examination regulations and processes that apply in almost all Australian universities, in particular the stringent rules relating to the nomination of examiners (which aim to avoid conflicts of interest between examiners and the candidate or his/her supervisors) and the fact that there tends to be no oral examination component in PhD assessment. Drawing on their extensive experience both as examiners and as supervisors, informants share candidly what frustrates them and brings them joy in PhD examination, touching on matters such as what makes a PhD different from a Master's thesis, how they respond to borderline theses and those with non-standard English, the role of the supervisor post thesis submission, and how Australia's PhD standards compare with those from candidates in other countries.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe experience of examining the PhD
Subtitle of host publicationan international comparative study of processes and standards of doctoral examination
EditorsMicahel Byram, Maria Stoicheva
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor and Francis Group
Chapter17
Pages234-249
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781003248569
ISBN (Print)9781032164366, 9781032156972
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Publication series

NameRoutledge Research in Higher Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Macquarie University, Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this