Major trauma mortality in rural and metropolitan NSW, 2009-2014

a retrospective analysis of trauma registry data

Michael M. Dinh*, Kate Curtis, Rebecca J. Mitchell, Kendall J. Bein, Zsolt J. Balogh, Ian Seppelt, Colin Deans, Rebecca Ivers, Saartje Berendsen Russell, Oran Rigby

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine trends in crude and risk-adjusted mortality for major trauma patients injured in rural or metropolitan New South Wales, 2009e2014. Design: A retrospective analysis of NSW statewide trauma registry data. Participants: Adult patients (aged 16 years or more) who presented with major trauma (Injury Severity Scores greater than 15) to a NSW hospital during 2009e2014. Main outcome measures: The main covariate of interest was geographic location of injury (metropolitan v rural/regional areas). Inpatientmortalitywasanalysedbymultivariable logistic regression. Results: Data for 11 423 eligible patients were analysed. Inpatient mortality for those injured in metropolitan locations was 14.7% in 2009 and 16.1% in 2014 (P = 0.45). In rural locations, there was a statistically significant decline in in-hospital mortality over the study period, from 12.1% in 2009 to 8.7% in 2014 (P = 0.004). Risk-adjusted mortality for those injured in a rural location was lower in 2013 than during 2009, but remained stable for those injured in metropolitan locations. Conclusion: Crude and risk-adjusted mortality after major trauma have remained stable in those injured in metropolitan areas of NSW between 2009 and 2014. The apparent downward trend in mortality associated with severe trauma in rural/regional locations requires further analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-407
Number of pages5
JournalMedical Journal of Australia
Volume205
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Major trauma mortality in rural and metropolitan NSW, 2009-2014: a retrospective analysis of trauma registry data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this