Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and 'becoming-world' in planning theory

Donna Houston, Jean Hillier, Diana MacCallum, Wendy Steele, Jason Byrne

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Much planning theory has been undergirded by an ontological exceptionalism of humans. Yet, city planning does not sit outside of the eco-social realities co-producing the Anthropocene. Urban planners and scholars, therefore, need to think carefully and critically about who speaks for (and with) the nonhuman in place making. In this article, we identify two fruitful directions for planning theory to better engage with the imbricated nature of humans and nonhumans is recognised as characteristic of the Anthropocene – multispecies entanglements and becoming-world. Drawing on the more-than-human literature in urban and cultural geography and the environmental humanities, we consider how these terms offer new possibilities for productively rethinking the ontological exceptionalism of humans in planning theory. We critically explore how planning theory might develop inclusive, ethical relationships that can nurture possibilities for multispecies flourishing in diverse urban futures, the futures that are increasingly recognised as co-produced by nonhuman agents in the context of climate variability and change. This, we argue, is critical for developing climate-adaptive planning tools and narratives for the creation of socially and environmentally just multispecies cities.
LanguageEnglish
Pages190-212
Number of pages23
JournalPlanning Theory
Volume17
Issue number2
Early online date3 Feb 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2018

Fingerprint

planning theory
climate
urban geography
cultural geography
urban planner
planning
social reality
narrative
city
world
Anthropocene

Keywords

  • Anthropocene
  • becoming-world
  • cities
  • climate change
  • multispecies

Cite this

Houston, Donna ; Hillier, Jean ; MacCallum, Diana ; Steele, Wendy ; Byrne, Jason. / Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and 'becoming-world' in planning theory. In: Planning Theory. 2018 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 190-212.
@article{c52349759a574c0c8ae08a92c6d50024,
title = "Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and 'becoming-world' in planning theory",
abstract = "Much planning theory has been undergirded by an ontological exceptionalism of humans. Yet, city planning does not sit outside of the eco-social realities co-producing the Anthropocene. Urban planners and scholars, therefore, need to think carefully and critically about who speaks for (and with) the nonhuman in place making. In this article, we identify two fruitful directions for planning theory to better engage with the imbricated nature of humans and nonhumans is recognised as characteristic of the Anthropocene – multispecies entanglements and becoming-world. Drawing on the more-than-human literature in urban and cultural geography and the environmental humanities, we consider how these terms offer new possibilities for productively rethinking the ontological exceptionalism of humans in planning theory. We critically explore how planning theory might develop inclusive, ethical relationships that can nurture possibilities for multispecies flourishing in diverse urban futures, the futures that are increasingly recognised as co-produced by nonhuman agents in the context of climate variability and change. This, we argue, is critical for developing climate-adaptive planning tools and narratives for the creation of socially and environmentally just multispecies cities.",
keywords = "Anthropocene, becoming-world, cities, climate change, multispecies",
author = "Donna Houston and Jean Hillier and Diana MacCallum and Wendy Steele and Jason Byrne",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1473095216688042",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "190--212",
journal = "Planning Theory",
issn = "1473-0952",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and 'becoming-world' in planning theory. / Houston, Donna; Hillier, Jean; MacCallum, Diana; Steele, Wendy; Byrne, Jason.

In: Planning Theory, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.05.2018, p. 190-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and 'becoming-world' in planning theory

AU - Houston, Donna

AU - Hillier, Jean

AU - MacCallum, Diana

AU - Steele, Wendy

AU - Byrne, Jason

PY - 2018/5/1

Y1 - 2018/5/1

N2 - Much planning theory has been undergirded by an ontological exceptionalism of humans. Yet, city planning does not sit outside of the eco-social realities co-producing the Anthropocene. Urban planners and scholars, therefore, need to think carefully and critically about who speaks for (and with) the nonhuman in place making. In this article, we identify two fruitful directions for planning theory to better engage with the imbricated nature of humans and nonhumans is recognised as characteristic of the Anthropocene – multispecies entanglements and becoming-world. Drawing on the more-than-human literature in urban and cultural geography and the environmental humanities, we consider how these terms offer new possibilities for productively rethinking the ontological exceptionalism of humans in planning theory. We critically explore how planning theory might develop inclusive, ethical relationships that can nurture possibilities for multispecies flourishing in diverse urban futures, the futures that are increasingly recognised as co-produced by nonhuman agents in the context of climate variability and change. This, we argue, is critical for developing climate-adaptive planning tools and narratives for the creation of socially and environmentally just multispecies cities.

AB - Much planning theory has been undergirded by an ontological exceptionalism of humans. Yet, city planning does not sit outside of the eco-social realities co-producing the Anthropocene. Urban planners and scholars, therefore, need to think carefully and critically about who speaks for (and with) the nonhuman in place making. In this article, we identify two fruitful directions for planning theory to better engage with the imbricated nature of humans and nonhumans is recognised as characteristic of the Anthropocene – multispecies entanglements and becoming-world. Drawing on the more-than-human literature in urban and cultural geography and the environmental humanities, we consider how these terms offer new possibilities for productively rethinking the ontological exceptionalism of humans in planning theory. We critically explore how planning theory might develop inclusive, ethical relationships that can nurture possibilities for multispecies flourishing in diverse urban futures, the futures that are increasingly recognised as co-produced by nonhuman agents in the context of climate variability and change. This, we argue, is critical for developing climate-adaptive planning tools and narratives for the creation of socially and environmentally just multispecies cities.

KW - Anthropocene

KW - becoming-world

KW - cities

KW - climate change

KW - multispecies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045460491&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP150100299

U2 - 10.1177/1473095216688042

DO - 10.1177/1473095216688042

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 190

EP - 212

JO - Planning Theory

T2 - Planning Theory

JF - Planning Theory

SN - 1473-0952

IS - 2

ER -