Abstract
A new model is proposed for enhancing patient safety using market-based control (MBC), inspired by successful approaches to environmental governance. Emissions trading, enshrined in the Kyoto protocol, set a carbon price and created a carbon market-is it possible to set a patient safety price and let the marketplace find ways of reducing clinically adverse events? To "cap and trade, " a regulator would need to establish system-wide and organisation-specific targets, based on the cost of adverse events, create a safety market for trading safety credits and then police the market. Organisations are given a clear policy signal to reduce adverse event rates, are told by how much, but are free to find mechanisms best suited to their local needs. The market would inevitably generate novel ways of creating safety credits, and accountability becomes hard to evade when adverse events are explicitly measured and accounted for in an organisation's bottom line.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 99-103 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Quality and Safety in Health Care |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Apr 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Market-based control mechanisms for patient safety'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver