Market fairness: the poor country cousin of market efficiency

Michael J. Aitken, Angelo Aspris, Sean Foley, Frederick H. de B. Harris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Both fairness and efficiency are important considerations in market design and regulation, yet many regulators have neither defined nor measured these concepts. We develop an evidencebased policy framework in which these are both defined and measured using a series of empirical proxies. We then build a systems estimation model to examine the 2003–2011 explosive growth in algorithmic trading (AT) on the London Stock Exchange and NYSE Euronext Paris. Our results show that greater AT is associated with increased transactional efficiency and reduced information leakage in top quintile stocks. For less liquid stocks, manipulation at the close declines. We also document the tradeoff between reduced spreads and increased manipulation or information leakage following the introduction of MiFID1.

LanguageEnglish
Pages5–23
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Volume147
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

fairness
manipulation
increased efficiency
efficiency
stock exchange
market
regulation
Fairness
Algorithmic trading
Leakage
Manipulation
Market efficiency
Market regulation
New York Stock Exchange
Trade-offs
Market design
London Stock Exchange
Liquid

Keywords

  • Algorithmic trading
  • Information leakage
  • Manipulation
  • Market fairness
  • Market quality

Cite this

Aitken, Michael J. ; Aspris, Angelo ; Foley, Sean ; Harris, Frederick H. de B. / Market fairness : the poor country cousin of market efficiency. In: Journal of Business Ethics. 2018 ; Vol. 147, No. 1. pp. 5–23.
@article{c8393cb171f5455799eb5349f70a7d7a,
title = "Market fairness: the poor country cousin of market efficiency",
abstract = "Both fairness and efficiency are important considerations in market design and regulation, yet many regulators have neither defined nor measured these concepts. We develop an evidencebased policy framework in which these are both defined and measured using a series of empirical proxies. We then build a systems estimation model to examine the 2003–2011 explosive growth in algorithmic trading (AT) on the London Stock Exchange and NYSE Euronext Paris. Our results show that greater AT is associated with increased transactional efficiency and reduced information leakage in top quintile stocks. For less liquid stocks, manipulation at the close declines. We also document the tradeoff between reduced spreads and increased manipulation or information leakage following the introduction of MiFID1.",
keywords = "Algorithmic trading, Information leakage, Manipulation, Market fairness, Market quality",
author = "Aitken, {Michael J.} and Angelo Aspris and Sean Foley and Harris, {Frederick H. de B.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10551-015-2964-y",
language = "English",
volume = "147",
pages = "5–23",
journal = "Journal of Business Ethics",
issn = "0167-4544",
publisher = "KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL",
number = "1",

}

Market fairness : the poor country cousin of market efficiency. / Aitken, Michael J.; Aspris, Angelo; Foley, Sean; Harris, Frederick H. de B.

In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 147, No. 1, 01.2018, p. 5–23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Market fairness

T2 - Journal of Business Ethics

AU - Aitken, Michael J.

AU - Aspris, Angelo

AU - Foley, Sean

AU - Harris, Frederick H. de B.

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - Both fairness and efficiency are important considerations in market design and regulation, yet many regulators have neither defined nor measured these concepts. We develop an evidencebased policy framework in which these are both defined and measured using a series of empirical proxies. We then build a systems estimation model to examine the 2003–2011 explosive growth in algorithmic trading (AT) on the London Stock Exchange and NYSE Euronext Paris. Our results show that greater AT is associated with increased transactional efficiency and reduced information leakage in top quintile stocks. For less liquid stocks, manipulation at the close declines. We also document the tradeoff between reduced spreads and increased manipulation or information leakage following the introduction of MiFID1.

AB - Both fairness and efficiency are important considerations in market design and regulation, yet many regulators have neither defined nor measured these concepts. We develop an evidencebased policy framework in which these are both defined and measured using a series of empirical proxies. We then build a systems estimation model to examine the 2003–2011 explosive growth in algorithmic trading (AT) on the London Stock Exchange and NYSE Euronext Paris. Our results show that greater AT is associated with increased transactional efficiency and reduced information leakage in top quintile stocks. For less liquid stocks, manipulation at the close declines. We also document the tradeoff between reduced spreads and increased manipulation or information leakage following the introduction of MiFID1.

KW - Algorithmic trading

KW - Information leakage

KW - Manipulation

KW - Market fairness

KW - Market quality

U2 - 10.1007/s10551-015-2964-y

DO - 10.1007/s10551-015-2964-y

M3 - Article

VL - 147

SP - 5

EP - 23

JO - Journal of Business Ethics

JF - Journal of Business Ethics

SN - 0167-4544

IS - 1

ER -