TY - BOOK
T1 - Marketisation in Nordic eldercare
T2 - a research report on legislation, oversight, extent and consequences
AU - Anttonen, Anneli
AU - Meagher, Gabrielle
AU - Vabø, Mia
AU - Christensen, Karen
AU - Jacobsen, Frode Fadnes
AU - Trœtteberg, Håkon Dalby
AU - Banerjee, Albert
AU - Armstrong, Pat
AU - Harrington, Charlene
AU - Erlandsson, Sara
AU - Storm, Palle
AU - Stranz, Anneli
AU - Szebehely, Marta
AU - Trydegård, Gun-Britt
AU - Karsio, Olli
AU - Bertelsen, Tilde Marie
AU - Rostgaard, Tine
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The Nordic countries share a tradition of universal, tax-financed eldercare services, centred on public provision. Yet Nordic eldercare has not escaped the influence of the global wave of marketisation in recent years. Market-inspired measures, such as competitive tendering and user choice models, have been introduced in all Nordic countries, and in some countries, there has been an increase of private, for-profit provision of care services. This report, researched and written by Normacare members, is the first effort to comprehensively document the process of marketisation in Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Norway. Our hope is that the report will provide both a foundation and an inspiration for further research on change in Nordic eldercare. The report seeks to answer the following questions: What kinds of market reforms have been carried out in Nordic eldercare systems? What is the extent of privately provided services? How is the quality of marketised eldercare monitored? What has the impact of marketisation been on users of eldercare, on care workers and on eldercare systems? Are marketisation trends similar in the four countries, or are there major differences between them? The report also includes analyses of aspects of marketisation in Canada and the United States, where there is a longer history of markets in care. These contributions offer some perhaps salutary warnings for the Nordic countries about the risks of increasing competition and private provision in eldercare.
AB - The Nordic countries share a tradition of universal, tax-financed eldercare services, centred on public provision. Yet Nordic eldercare has not escaped the influence of the global wave of marketisation in recent years. Market-inspired measures, such as competitive tendering and user choice models, have been introduced in all Nordic countries, and in some countries, there has been an increase of private, for-profit provision of care services. This report, researched and written by Normacare members, is the first effort to comprehensively document the process of marketisation in Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Norway. Our hope is that the report will provide both a foundation and an inspiration for further research on change in Nordic eldercare. The report seeks to answer the following questions: What kinds of market reforms have been carried out in Nordic eldercare systems? What is the extent of privately provided services? How is the quality of marketised eldercare monitored? What has the impact of marketisation been on users of eldercare, on care workers and on eldercare systems? Are marketisation trends similar in the four countries, or are there major differences between them? The report also includes analyses of aspects of marketisation in Canada and the United States, where there is a longer history of markets in care. These contributions offer some perhaps salutary warnings for the Nordic countries about the risks of increasing competition and private provision in eldercare.
M3 - Other report
SN - 9789163732133
T3 - Stockholm studies in social work
BT - Marketisation in Nordic eldercare
PB - Stockholm University
CY - Stockholm, Sweden
ER -