McIntosh's unrealistic picture of Peacocke and Hopkins on realistic pictures

Catharine Abell

doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/ayi005

McIntosh's unrealistic picture of Peacocke and Hopkins on realistic pictures

Catharine Abell^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Department of Philosophy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

I defend Christopher Peacocke's and Robert Hopkins's experienced resemblance accounts of depiction against criticisms put forward by Gavin McIntosh in a recent article in this journal. I argue that, while there may be reasons for rejecting Peacocke's and Hopkins's accounts, McIntosh fails to provide any.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	64-68
Number of pages	5
Journal	British Journal of Aesthetics
Volume	45
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/ayi005
Publication status	Published - 2005

Access to Document

10.1093/bjaesthetics/ayi005

Cite this

@article{86ab462777024b3a8c873faff7dcec76,

title = "McIntosh's unrealistic picture of Peacocke and Hopkins on realistic pictures",

abstract = "I defend Christopher Peacocke's and Robert Hopkins's experienced resemblance accounts of depiction against criticisms put forward by Gavin McIntosh in a recent article in this journal. I argue that, while there may be reasons for rejecting Peacocke's and Hopkins's accounts, McIntosh fails to provide any.",

author = "Catharine Abell",

year = "2005",

doi = "10.1093/bjaesthetics/ayi005",

language = "English",

volume = "45",

pages = "64--68",

journal = "British Journal of Aesthetics",

issn = "0007-0904",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - McIntosh's unrealistic picture of Peacocke and Hopkins on realistic pictures

AU - Abell, Catharine

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - I defend Christopher Peacocke's and Robert Hopkins's experienced resemblance accounts of depiction against criticisms put forward by Gavin McIntosh in a recent article in this journal. I argue that, while there may be reasons for rejecting Peacocke's and Hopkins's accounts, McIntosh fails to provide any.

AB - I defend Christopher Peacocke's and Robert Hopkins's experienced resemblance accounts of depiction against criticisms put forward by Gavin McIntosh in a recent article in this journal. I argue that, while there may be reasons for rejecting Peacocke's and Hopkins's accounts, McIntosh fails to provide any.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249432399&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/bjaesthetics/ayi005

DO - 10.1093/bjaesthetics/ayi005

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34249432399

SN - 0007-0904

VL - 45

SP - 64

EP - 68

JO - British Journal of Aesthetics

JF - British Journal of Aesthetics

IS - 1

ER -

McIntosh's unrealistic picture of Peacocke and Hopkins on realistic pictures

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this