Measurement accuracy of non-invasively obtained central blood pressure by applanation tonometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hao-Min Cheng, Dora Lang, Catalin Tufanaru, Alan Pearson

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background and objectives: Non-invasive methods based on applanation tonometry have been proposed to estimate central blood pressure. However, the accuracy of these methods hasn't been systematically examined.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing estimated and invasively measured central BP.

Results: Sufficient data were available in 22 studies for meta-analysis (857 subjects and 1167 measurements). Acquired arterial pressure waveforms in these studies were directly measured, calibrated to match invasive aortic mean BP and diastolic BP or calibrated to match brachial BP measured with a sphygmomanometer, cuff BP. Of the former 2 conditions, the errors of estimated central BP were small with a mean and standard deviation of difference -1.1 ± 4.1 mm Hg (95% limits of agreement -9.1-6.9 mm Hg) for central systolic BP; -0.5 ± 2.1 mm Hg (-4.6-3.6 mm Hg) for central diastolic BP; and -0.8 ± 5.1 mm Hg (-10.8-9.2 mm Hg) for central pulse pressure. However, the errors inflated to -8.2 ± 10.3 mm Hg (-28.4-12.0 mm Hg) for central systolic BP, 7.6 ± 8.7 mm Hg (-9.5-24.6 mm Hg) for central diastolic BP, and -12.2 ± 10.4 mm Hg (-32.5-8.1 mm Hg) for central pulse pressure, when calibrated to cuff BP. The findings were still evident in subgroup analysis conducted with different central BP estimating methods and validated cuff BP monitors.

Conclusion: Present tonometry-based central BP estimating methods are acceptable in theory, with small errors. However, based on current available evidence, there is substantial room for improvement in measurement accuracy of central BP when cuff BP is used to calibrate the peripheral waveforms.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1867-1876
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume167
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2013
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Central blood pressure
  • Applanation tonometry
  • Transfer function
  • SphygmoCor
  • Late systolic peak
  • Sphygmomanometer

Cite this

@article{3bd69d6179434254a2ff346508107498,
title = "Measurement accuracy of non-invasively obtained central blood pressure by applanation tonometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Background and objectives: Non-invasive methods based on applanation tonometry have been proposed to estimate central blood pressure. However, the accuracy of these methods hasn't been systematically examined.Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing estimated and invasively measured central BP.Results: Sufficient data were available in 22 studies for meta-analysis (857 subjects and 1167 measurements). Acquired arterial pressure waveforms in these studies were directly measured, calibrated to match invasive aortic mean BP and diastolic BP or calibrated to match brachial BP measured with a sphygmomanometer, cuff BP. Of the former 2 conditions, the errors of estimated central BP were small with a mean and standard deviation of difference -1.1 ± 4.1 mm Hg (95{\%} limits of agreement -9.1-6.9 mm Hg) for central systolic BP; -0.5 ± 2.1 mm Hg (-4.6-3.6 mm Hg) for central diastolic BP; and -0.8 ± 5.1 mm Hg (-10.8-9.2 mm Hg) for central pulse pressure. However, the errors inflated to -8.2 ± 10.3 mm Hg (-28.4-12.0 mm Hg) for central systolic BP, 7.6 ± 8.7 mm Hg (-9.5-24.6 mm Hg) for central diastolic BP, and -12.2 ± 10.4 mm Hg (-32.5-8.1 mm Hg) for central pulse pressure, when calibrated to cuff BP. The findings were still evident in subgroup analysis conducted with different central BP estimating methods and validated cuff BP monitors.Conclusion: Present tonometry-based central BP estimating methods are acceptable in theory, with small errors. However, based on current available evidence, there is substantial room for improvement in measurement accuracy of central BP when cuff BP is used to calibrate the peripheral waveforms.",
keywords = "Central blood pressure, Applanation tonometry, Transfer function, SphygmoCor, Late systolic peak, Sphygmomanometer",
author = "Hao-Min Cheng and Dora Lang and Catalin Tufanaru and Alan Pearson",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.155",
language = "English",
volume = "167",
pages = "1867--1876",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "5",

}

Measurement accuracy of non-invasively obtained central blood pressure by applanation tonometry : a systematic review and meta-analysis. / Cheng, Hao-Min; Lang, Dora; Tufanaru, Catalin; Pearson, Alan.

In: International Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 167, No. 5, 01.09.2013, p. 1867-1876.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measurement accuracy of non-invasively obtained central blood pressure by applanation tonometry

T2 - International Journal of Cardiology

AU - Cheng, Hao-Min

AU - Lang, Dora

AU - Tufanaru, Catalin

AU - Pearson, Alan

PY - 2013/9/1

Y1 - 2013/9/1

N2 - Background and objectives: Non-invasive methods based on applanation tonometry have been proposed to estimate central blood pressure. However, the accuracy of these methods hasn't been systematically examined.Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing estimated and invasively measured central BP.Results: Sufficient data were available in 22 studies for meta-analysis (857 subjects and 1167 measurements). Acquired arterial pressure waveforms in these studies were directly measured, calibrated to match invasive aortic mean BP and diastolic BP or calibrated to match brachial BP measured with a sphygmomanometer, cuff BP. Of the former 2 conditions, the errors of estimated central BP were small with a mean and standard deviation of difference -1.1 ± 4.1 mm Hg (95% limits of agreement -9.1-6.9 mm Hg) for central systolic BP; -0.5 ± 2.1 mm Hg (-4.6-3.6 mm Hg) for central diastolic BP; and -0.8 ± 5.1 mm Hg (-10.8-9.2 mm Hg) for central pulse pressure. However, the errors inflated to -8.2 ± 10.3 mm Hg (-28.4-12.0 mm Hg) for central systolic BP, 7.6 ± 8.7 mm Hg (-9.5-24.6 mm Hg) for central diastolic BP, and -12.2 ± 10.4 mm Hg (-32.5-8.1 mm Hg) for central pulse pressure, when calibrated to cuff BP. The findings were still evident in subgroup analysis conducted with different central BP estimating methods and validated cuff BP monitors.Conclusion: Present tonometry-based central BP estimating methods are acceptable in theory, with small errors. However, based on current available evidence, there is substantial room for improvement in measurement accuracy of central BP when cuff BP is used to calibrate the peripheral waveforms.

AB - Background and objectives: Non-invasive methods based on applanation tonometry have been proposed to estimate central blood pressure. However, the accuracy of these methods hasn't been systematically examined.Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing estimated and invasively measured central BP.Results: Sufficient data were available in 22 studies for meta-analysis (857 subjects and 1167 measurements). Acquired arterial pressure waveforms in these studies were directly measured, calibrated to match invasive aortic mean BP and diastolic BP or calibrated to match brachial BP measured with a sphygmomanometer, cuff BP. Of the former 2 conditions, the errors of estimated central BP were small with a mean and standard deviation of difference -1.1 ± 4.1 mm Hg (95% limits of agreement -9.1-6.9 mm Hg) for central systolic BP; -0.5 ± 2.1 mm Hg (-4.6-3.6 mm Hg) for central diastolic BP; and -0.8 ± 5.1 mm Hg (-10.8-9.2 mm Hg) for central pulse pressure. However, the errors inflated to -8.2 ± 10.3 mm Hg (-28.4-12.0 mm Hg) for central systolic BP, 7.6 ± 8.7 mm Hg (-9.5-24.6 mm Hg) for central diastolic BP, and -12.2 ± 10.4 mm Hg (-32.5-8.1 mm Hg) for central pulse pressure, when calibrated to cuff BP. The findings were still evident in subgroup analysis conducted with different central BP estimating methods and validated cuff BP monitors.Conclusion: Present tonometry-based central BP estimating methods are acceptable in theory, with small errors. However, based on current available evidence, there is substantial room for improvement in measurement accuracy of central BP when cuff BP is used to calibrate the peripheral waveforms.

KW - Central blood pressure

KW - Applanation tonometry

KW - Transfer function

KW - SphygmoCor

KW - Late systolic peak

KW - Sphygmomanometer

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.155

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.04.155

M3 - Review article

VL - 167

SP - 1867

EP - 1876

JO - International Journal of Cardiology

JF - International Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0167-5273

IS - 5

ER -