Measuring clinician experience in value-based healthcare initiatives: a 10-item core clinician experience measure

Reema Harrison, Louise A. Ellis, Maryam Sina, Ramya Walsan, Rebecca Mitchell, Ramesh Walpola, Glen Maberly, Catherine Chan, Liz Hay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective. Clinician's experiences of providing care are identified as a key outcome associated with value-based healthcare (VBHC). In contrast to patient-reported experience measures, measurement tools to capture clinician's experiences in relation to VBHC initiatives have received limited attention to date. Progressing from an initial 18-item clinician experience measure (CEM), we sought to develop and evaluate the reliability of a set of 10 core clinician experience measure items in the CEM-10. Methods. A multi-method project was conducted using a consensus workshop with clinicians from a range of NSW Health local health districts to reduce the 18-item CEM to a short form 10-item core clinician experience measure (CEM-10). The CEM-10 was deployed with clinicians providing diabetes care, care for older adults and virtual care across all districts and care settings of New South Wales, Australia. Psychometric analysis was used to determine the internal consistency of the tool and its suitability for diverse clinical contexts. Results. Consensus building sessions led to a rationalised 10-item tool, retaining the four domains of psychological safety (two items), quality of care (three items), clinician engagement (three items) and interprofessional collaboration (two items). Data from four clinician cohorts (n = 1029) demonstrated that the CEM-10 four-factor model produced a good fit to the data and high levels of reliability, with factor loadings ranging from 0.77 to 0.92, with Cronbach's alpha (range: 0.79-0.90) and composite reliability (range: 0.80-0.92). Conclusions. The CEM-10 provides a core set of common clinician experience measurement items that can be used to compare clinician's experiences of providing care between and within cohorts. The CEM-10 may be supported by additional items relevant to particular initiatives when evaluating VBHC outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)160-166
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian Health Review
Volume48
Issue number2
Early online date12 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2024

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Author(s) 2024. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

A corrigendum exists for this article and can be found in Australian Health Review (2024) Vol 48(4) p.486 at doi:10.1071/AH24003_CO

Keywords

  • clinician experience
  • measurement
  • survey
  • value‐based care.
  • workforce

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring clinician experience in value-based healthcare initiatives: a 10-item core clinician experience measure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this