Measuring relative cue strength as a means of validating an inventory of expert offender profiling cues

Ben W. Morrison*, Mark W. Wiggins, Nigel W. Bond, Michael D. Tyler

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    41 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Cues have been identified as important precursors to successful diagnoses among expert practitioners. However, current approaches to the identification of expert cues typically rely on subjective methods, making the validity of cues difficult to establish. The present research examined the utility of a Paired-Concept Association Task (P-CAT) as a basis for discriminating expert and novice cue activation in the context of offender profiling. Three studies are reported: 1A employed a cognitive interview for the acquisition of cue-based concepts used by experts and novices; 1B presented pairs of concepts as part of the P-CAT, which recorded response latency; and, 1C employed a survey to further gauge participants' perceptions of the concepts. The results revealed differences between experts and novices in the cue-based associations activated, and in the response latencies associated with the P-CAT, across expertise. The P-CAT accurately discriminated expert from novice cue activation and consequently offers a new method for objectively validating expert cue use.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)211-226
    Number of pages16
    JournalJournal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making
    Volume7
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

    Keywords

    • cue recognition
    • cue strength
    • cues
    • decision making
    • expertise
    • offender profiling

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring relative cue strength as a means of validating an inventory of expert offender profiling cues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this