TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring self-esteem in dieting disordered patients
T2 - The validity of the Rosenberg and Coopersmith contrasted
AU - Griffiths, Rosalyn A.
AU - Beumont, Pierre J V
AU - Giannakopoulos, Effy
AU - Russell, Janice
AU - Schotte, David
AU - Thornton, Chris
AU - Touyz, Stephen W.
AU - Varano, Pina
PY - 1999/3
Y1 - 1999/3
N2 - Objective: In order to ascertain the most appropriate measure of self- esteem for dieting disordered patients, this study contrasted the construct and convergent validities of two widely used measures. In addition, dieting disordered subgroups were compared on levels of self-esteem. Method: One hundred and seventeen male and female patients diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or eating disorder not otherwise specified completed the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES), the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (SEI), and measures of dieting disorder pathology and depression. Results: No significant differences among the three dieting disorder subgroups were found. In determining convergent validity, regression analyses indicated that the SES was a significant predictor of dieting disorder psychopathology whereas the SEI was not. Of the two self-esteem measures, only the SES showed evidence of convergent validity. Discussion: The results suggest that the SES has sounder construct and convergent validity than the SEI. Hence, the SES may be more appropriate for use with dieting disordered populations.
AB - Objective: In order to ascertain the most appropriate measure of self- esteem for dieting disordered patients, this study contrasted the construct and convergent validities of two widely used measures. In addition, dieting disordered subgroups were compared on levels of self-esteem. Method: One hundred and seventeen male and female patients diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or eating disorder not otherwise specified completed the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES), the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (SEI), and measures of dieting disorder pathology and depression. Results: No significant differences among the three dieting disorder subgroups were found. In determining convergent validity, regression analyses indicated that the SES was a significant predictor of dieting disorder psychopathology whereas the SEI was not. Of the two self-esteem measures, only the SES showed evidence of convergent validity. Discussion: The results suggest that the SES has sounder construct and convergent validity than the SEI. Hence, the SES may be more appropriate for use with dieting disordered populations.
KW - Dieting disorders
KW - Measures
KW - Self-esteem
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032963851&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199903)25:2<227::AID-EAT13>3.0.CO;2-4
DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1098-108X(199903)25:2<227::AID-EAT13>3.0.CO;2-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 10065401
AN - SCOPUS:0032963851
SN - 0276-3478
VL - 25
SP - 227
EP - 231
JO - International Journal of Eating Disorders
JF - International Journal of Eating Disorders
IS - 2
ER -