Abstract
Objective: In order to ascertain the most appropriate measure of self- esteem for dieting disordered patients, this study contrasted the construct and convergent validities of two widely used measures. In addition, dieting disordered subgroups were compared on levels of self-esteem. Method: One hundred and seventeen male and female patients diagnosed with anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or eating disorder not otherwise specified completed the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (SES), the Coopersmith Self-Esteem Inventory (SEI), and measures of dieting disorder pathology and depression. Results: No significant differences among the three dieting disorder subgroups were found. In determining convergent validity, regression analyses indicated that the SES was a significant predictor of dieting disorder psychopathology whereas the SEI was not. Of the two self-esteem measures, only the SES showed evidence of convergent validity. Discussion: The results suggest that the SES has sounder construct and convergent validity than the SEI. Hence, the SES may be more appropriate for use with dieting disordered populations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 227-231 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | International Journal of Eating Disorders |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 1999 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Dieting disorders
- Measures
- Self-esteem
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Measuring self-esteem in dieting disordered patients: The validity of the Rosenberg and Coopersmith contrasted'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver