TY - JOUR
T1 - Melt migration and interaction in a dunite channel system within oceanic forearc mantle
T2 - the Yushigou harzburgite-dunite associations, North Qilian Ophiolite (NW China)
AU - Zhou, Xiang
AU - Zheng, Jianping
AU - Li, Yibing
AU - Zhu, Hui
AU - Griffin, William L.
AU - O'Reilly, Suzanne Y.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Harzburgite–dunite associations in the Yushigou ophiolitic complex
(North Qilian suture, NW China) offer insights into melt migration and
melt–rock interaction above a subduction zone. Based on detailed
petrographic and in situ analyses, we propose a three-stage
model to describe the history of melt channel formation in oceanic arc
mantle. In the first stage, high-degree melt extraction was followed by
widespread infiltration of small-volume melts, which formed the
harzburgite that makes up most of the Yushigou complex. The Yushigou
harzburgites thus have highly refractory major-element compositions
(olivine Fo = 91·1–93·2, spinel Cr# [atomic 100 × Cr/(Cr + Al)] =
55·2–62·9, whole-rock Mg# = 90·5–92·0, Al2O3 = 0·29–0·74 wt%, CaO = 0·35–0·54 wt%, and low Na2O
= 0·02–0·05 wt%) but slight enrichment in the light rare earth elements
(LREE). In the second stage, high-volume focused melts infiltrated into
the mantle wedge and produced two types of dunite, with high-Cr#
(mainly 63·1–73·6) versus low-Cr# (23·6–33·7) spinel. In the low-Cr#
dunites, spinels have significantly fewer inclusions and lower Fo values
(88·7–90·1) in olivine than in the high-Cr# dunite (Fo = 89·9–90·5),
together with higher modal abundances of interstitial sulfides. The two
groups of dunite show similar extremely low TiO2 (<0·01 wt%) but different igneous clinopyroxene trace-element patterns (ΣLREE/ΣHREE ≈ 1 in low-Cr# dunite versus ΣLREE/ΣHREE
>10 in high-Cr# dunite), indicating distinct differences in the
infiltrating melts. The low-Cr# dunite is a cumulate from an anhydrous
Al- and S-enriched basaltic melt, whereas the high-Cr# dunite was
produced by reaction of harzburgite with a carbon-bearing, alkaline
hydrous silicate magma. The confluence of these melt migrations finally
formed a channelized dunite network, and later magmatic activity was
restricted to these channels. Pulsated melt supply after chromite
crystallization formed pervasive sieve-textured rims around spinel in
both kinds of dunite, but these are rare in the harzburgite. The third
stage was marked by fluid-dominated metasomatism recorded by
millimeter-scale veined conduits, which contain carbonate (dolomite and
magnesite), amphibole, phlogopite and compound crystal assemblages in
both kinds of dunite. CH4–N2–graphite-dominated
fluid inclusions are widespread in all lithologies, recording the
volatiles transported during the last metasomatic event. The Yushigou
complex thus provides a detailed example of interaction between multiple
batches of melt or fluid and a lithospheric mantle wedge dunitic
channel system. The results of this study further suggest that the
formation of podiform chromite requires melt participation, and the
nature and origins of the melts can be diverse.
AB - Harzburgite–dunite associations in the Yushigou ophiolitic complex
(North Qilian suture, NW China) offer insights into melt migration and
melt–rock interaction above a subduction zone. Based on detailed
petrographic and in situ analyses, we propose a three-stage
model to describe the history of melt channel formation in oceanic arc
mantle. In the first stage, high-degree melt extraction was followed by
widespread infiltration of small-volume melts, which formed the
harzburgite that makes up most of the Yushigou complex. The Yushigou
harzburgites thus have highly refractory major-element compositions
(olivine Fo = 91·1–93·2, spinel Cr# [atomic 100 × Cr/(Cr + Al)] =
55·2–62·9, whole-rock Mg# = 90·5–92·0, Al2O3 = 0·29–0·74 wt%, CaO = 0·35–0·54 wt%, and low Na2O
= 0·02–0·05 wt%) but slight enrichment in the light rare earth elements
(LREE). In the second stage, high-volume focused melts infiltrated into
the mantle wedge and produced two types of dunite, with high-Cr#
(mainly 63·1–73·6) versus low-Cr# (23·6–33·7) spinel. In the low-Cr#
dunites, spinels have significantly fewer inclusions and lower Fo values
(88·7–90·1) in olivine than in the high-Cr# dunite (Fo = 89·9–90·5),
together with higher modal abundances of interstitial sulfides. The two
groups of dunite show similar extremely low TiO2 (<0·01 wt%) but different igneous clinopyroxene trace-element patterns (ΣLREE/ΣHREE ≈ 1 in low-Cr# dunite versus ΣLREE/ΣHREE
>10 in high-Cr# dunite), indicating distinct differences in the
infiltrating melts. The low-Cr# dunite is a cumulate from an anhydrous
Al- and S-enriched basaltic melt, whereas the high-Cr# dunite was
produced by reaction of harzburgite with a carbon-bearing, alkaline
hydrous silicate magma. The confluence of these melt migrations finally
formed a channelized dunite network, and later magmatic activity was
restricted to these channels. Pulsated melt supply after chromite
crystallization formed pervasive sieve-textured rims around spinel in
both kinds of dunite, but these are rare in the harzburgite. The third
stage was marked by fluid-dominated metasomatism recorded by
millimeter-scale veined conduits, which contain carbonate (dolomite and
magnesite), amphibole, phlogopite and compound crystal assemblages in
both kinds of dunite. CH4–N2–graphite-dominated
fluid inclusions are widespread in all lithologies, recording the
volatiles transported during the last metasomatic event. The Yushigou
complex thus provides a detailed example of interaction between multiple
batches of melt or fluid and a lithospheric mantle wedge dunitic
channel system. The results of this study further suggest that the
formation of podiform chromite requires melt participation, and the
nature and origins of the melts can be diverse.
KW - harzburgite-dunite associations
KW - microstructure
KW - melt channel
KW - elt–peridotite interaction
KW - North Qilian
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113840694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/petrology/egaa115
DO - 10.1093/petrology/egaa115
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85113840694
SN - 0022-3530
VL - 62
SP - 1
EP - 32
JO - Journal of Petrology
JF - Journal of Petrology
IS - 7
M1 - egaa115
ER -