TY - JOUR
T1 - Mental health legislation and psychiatric treatments in NSW
T2 - Electroconvulsive therapy and deep brain stimulation
AU - Loo, Colleen
AU - Trollor, Julian
AU - Alonzo, Angelo
AU - Rendina, Nicola
AU - Kavess, Rosemary
PY - 2010/10
Y1 - 2010/10
N2 - Objective: The aim of this paper is to discuss the restriction of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to the treatment of psychiatric disorders and the prohibition of psychosurgery and deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the NSW Mental Health Act 2007 (MHA), and to examine these restrictions from clinical and human rights perspectives. Method: Sections of the NSW MHA regulating the use of ECT, psychosurgery and DBS were reviewed. These were compared with corresponding regulations in mental health legislation in other Australian states. Reasons for discrepancies were explored. Results: Restrictions in the MHA on the use of ECT, psychosurgery and DBS are not in line with current clinical evidence of their efficacy and safety. The prohibitions aim to ensure safeguards are in place but the legislation fails to balance these objectives with the potential clinical benefit offered by these treatments. Conclusions: By imposing restrictions which are not justifiable in terms of the clinical evidence available, the MHA discriminates against those with neurological disorders responsive to psychiatric treatments, and those with psychiatric disorders who would benefit from the development of DBS as a treatment.
AB - Objective: The aim of this paper is to discuss the restriction of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to the treatment of psychiatric disorders and the prohibition of psychosurgery and deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the NSW Mental Health Act 2007 (MHA), and to examine these restrictions from clinical and human rights perspectives. Method: Sections of the NSW MHA regulating the use of ECT, psychosurgery and DBS were reviewed. These were compared with corresponding regulations in mental health legislation in other Australian states. Reasons for discrepancies were explored. Results: Restrictions in the MHA on the use of ECT, psychosurgery and DBS are not in line with current clinical evidence of their efficacy and safety. The prohibitions aim to ensure safeguards are in place but the legislation fails to balance these objectives with the potential clinical benefit offered by these treatments. Conclusions: By imposing restrictions which are not justifiable in terms of the clinical evidence available, the MHA discriminates against those with neurological disorders responsive to psychiatric treatments, and those with psychiatric disorders who would benefit from the development of DBS as a treatment.
KW - deep brain stimulation
KW - electroconvulsive therapy
KW - human rights
KW - mental health act
KW - psychosurgery
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957236221&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/10398562.2010.508125
DO - 10.3109/10398562.2010.508125
M3 - Article
C2 - 20863180
AN - SCOPUS:77957236221
SN - 1039-8562
VL - 18
SP - 417
EP - 425
JO - Australasian Psychiatry
JF - Australasian Psychiatry
IS - 5
ER -