Mercury wet deposition and coal-fired power station contributions: an Australian study

Upma Dutt, Peter F. Nelson*, Anthony L. Morrison, Vladimir Strezov

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Regions that have large coal-fired power station regions may be prone to elevated mercury (Hg) deposition fluxes. Total mercury (THg) in daily rainfall samples at a near-field sampling site (Hunter Valley) and a far-field station (Sydney) has been monitored in this study employing ultra-clean sampling techniques and Cold Vapour Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry (CVAFS) analysis. Measurements of THg range from 0.9 to 16.5 and from 1.2 to 18.9 ng/L for the far-field and near-field sites respectively. Average daily THg wet deposition fluxes were 49.9 and 79.8 ng/m2 for the far and near-field sites respectively. A two-sample t-test reveals the near-field site to have higher rainfall mercury (significant at the 95% level) and deposition fluxes. At the far-field site, lower Hg deposition occurs during the cooler months, while the Hunter Valley site has higher winter deposition. It is believed that the higher winter values near-field may be due to the combined impact of prevailing wind direction and high pollutant build up brought on by lower mixing height. Based on this study, the first in the Southern Hemisphere, we conclude that rainfall THg concentrations and Hg wet deposition fluxes at the two sites are comparable to rural sites in North America.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1354-1359
Number of pages6
JournalFuel Processing Technology
Volume90
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mercury wet deposition and coal-fired power station contributions: an Australian study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this