Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool

Zachary Munn, Timothy Hugh Barker, Sandeep Moola, Catalin Tufanaru, Cindy Stern, Alexa McArthur, Matthew Stephenson, Edoardo Aromataris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: Systematic reviews provide a rigorous synthesis of the best available evidence regarding a certain question. Where high-quality evidence is lacking, systematic reviewers may choose to rely on case series studies to provide information in relation to their question. However, to date there has been limited guidance on how to incorporate case series studies within systematic reviews assessing the effectiveness of an intervention, particularly with reference to assessing the methodological quality or risk of bias of these studies. Methods: An international working group was formed to review the methodological literature regarding case series as a form of evidence for inclusion in systematic reviews. The group then developed a critical appraisal tool based on the epidemiological literature relating to bias within these studies. This was then piloted, reviewed and approved by the international Scientific Committee of JBI. Results: The JBI critical appraisal tool for case series studies includes 10 questions addressing the internal validity and risk of bias of case series designs, particularly confounding, selection and information bias, in addition to the importance of clear reporting. Conclusion: In certain situations, case series designs may represent the best available evidence to inform clinical practice. The JBI critical appraisal tool for case series offers systematic reviewers an approved method to assess the methodological quality of these studies.

LanguageEnglish
Number of pages7
JournalJBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Selection Bias

Keywords

  • Assessment of methodological quality
  • case series
  • methodological guidance
  • risk of bias
  • systematic review

Cite this

Munn, Zachary ; Barker, Timothy Hugh ; Moola, Sandeep ; Tufanaru, Catalin ; Stern, Cindy ; McArthur, Alexa ; Stephenson, Matthew ; Aromataris, Edoardo. / Methodological quality of case series studies : an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. In: JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports. 2019.
@article{4fcda1c0a8854a0e8e6f877630c3ee31,
title = "Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool",
abstract = "Introduction: Systematic reviews provide a rigorous synthesis of the best available evidence regarding a certain question. Where high-quality evidence is lacking, systematic reviewers may choose to rely on case series studies to provide information in relation to their question. However, to date there has been limited guidance on how to incorporate case series studies within systematic reviews assessing the effectiveness of an intervention, particularly with reference to assessing the methodological quality or risk of bias of these studies. Methods: An international working group was formed to review the methodological literature regarding case series as a form of evidence for inclusion in systematic reviews. The group then developed a critical appraisal tool based on the epidemiological literature relating to bias within these studies. This was then piloted, reviewed and approved by the international Scientific Committee of JBI. Results: The JBI critical appraisal tool for case series studies includes 10 questions addressing the internal validity and risk of bias of case series designs, particularly confounding, selection and information bias, in addition to the importance of clear reporting. Conclusion: In certain situations, case series designs may represent the best available evidence to inform clinical practice. The JBI critical appraisal tool for case series offers systematic reviewers an approved method to assess the methodological quality of these studies.",
keywords = "Assessment of methodological quality, case series, methodological guidance, risk of bias, systematic review",
author = "Zachary Munn and Barker, {Timothy Hugh} and Sandeep Moola and Catalin Tufanaru and Cindy Stern and Alexa McArthur and Matthew Stephenson and Edoardo Aromataris",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "23",
doi = "10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099",
language = "English",
journal = "JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports",
issn = "1838-2142",
publisher = "Joanna Briggs Institute",

}

Methodological quality of case series studies : an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. / Munn, Zachary; Barker, Timothy Hugh; Moola, Sandeep; Tufanaru, Catalin; Stern, Cindy; McArthur, Alexa; Stephenson, Matthew; Aromataris, Edoardo.

In: JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports, 23.09.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Methodological quality of case series studies

T2 - JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

AU - Munn, Zachary

AU - Barker, Timothy Hugh

AU - Moola, Sandeep

AU - Tufanaru, Catalin

AU - Stern, Cindy

AU - McArthur, Alexa

AU - Stephenson, Matthew

AU - Aromataris, Edoardo

PY - 2019/9/23

Y1 - 2019/9/23

N2 - Introduction: Systematic reviews provide a rigorous synthesis of the best available evidence regarding a certain question. Where high-quality evidence is lacking, systematic reviewers may choose to rely on case series studies to provide information in relation to their question. However, to date there has been limited guidance on how to incorporate case series studies within systematic reviews assessing the effectiveness of an intervention, particularly with reference to assessing the methodological quality or risk of bias of these studies. Methods: An international working group was formed to review the methodological literature regarding case series as a form of evidence for inclusion in systematic reviews. The group then developed a critical appraisal tool based on the epidemiological literature relating to bias within these studies. This was then piloted, reviewed and approved by the international Scientific Committee of JBI. Results: The JBI critical appraisal tool for case series studies includes 10 questions addressing the internal validity and risk of bias of case series designs, particularly confounding, selection and information bias, in addition to the importance of clear reporting. Conclusion: In certain situations, case series designs may represent the best available evidence to inform clinical practice. The JBI critical appraisal tool for case series offers systematic reviewers an approved method to assess the methodological quality of these studies.

AB - Introduction: Systematic reviews provide a rigorous synthesis of the best available evidence regarding a certain question. Where high-quality evidence is lacking, systematic reviewers may choose to rely on case series studies to provide information in relation to their question. However, to date there has been limited guidance on how to incorporate case series studies within systematic reviews assessing the effectiveness of an intervention, particularly with reference to assessing the methodological quality or risk of bias of these studies. Methods: An international working group was formed to review the methodological literature regarding case series as a form of evidence for inclusion in systematic reviews. The group then developed a critical appraisal tool based on the epidemiological literature relating to bias within these studies. This was then piloted, reviewed and approved by the international Scientific Committee of JBI. Results: The JBI critical appraisal tool for case series studies includes 10 questions addressing the internal validity and risk of bias of case series designs, particularly confounding, selection and information bias, in addition to the importance of clear reporting. Conclusion: In certain situations, case series designs may represent the best available evidence to inform clinical practice. The JBI critical appraisal tool for case series offers systematic reviewers an approved method to assess the methodological quality of these studies.

KW - Assessment of methodological quality

KW - case series

KW - methodological guidance

KW - risk of bias

KW - systematic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072583874&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099

DO - 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00099

M3 - Article

JO - JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

JF - JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports

SN - 1838-2142

ER -