Abstract
As part of a study investigating research productivity of sociology PhD students in Australia, an application to the federal government’s Department of Education, Skills and Employment (DESE) aimed to establish a baseline count of completed sociology doctorates by university. It was anticipated that university totals might be different from PhD completions within the main sociology teaching units. The government data furnished by this inquiry have proved to be problematic in several ways. The gaps in the data may be explained by the fact that universities report sociology PhDs to DESE in more generic rather than discipline-specific Field of Education (FoE) codes or as PhDs in other disciplines. DESE has either not required or been able to enforce consistent reporting. This raises questions about the time and cost value of these annual compliance efforts. It also limits the value of these data to researchers in charting current and potential future trends.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 16-21 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Australian Universities' Review |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- university restructuring
- audit culture
- sociology PhDs
- FoE coding
- postgraduate research outputs
- PhD completions
- University restructuring
- FoE coding, postgraduate research outputs
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Metrics but little meaning: Department of Education, Skills and Employment reporting about Australian Sociology PhDs completions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver