Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

Kevin Phan*, Prashanth J. Rao, Andrew C. Kam, Ralph J. Mobbs

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

89 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: While open TLIF (O-TLIF) remains the mainstay approach, minimally invasive TLIF (MI-TLIF) may offer potential advantages of reduced trauma to paraspinal muscles, minimized perioperative blood loss, quicker recovery and reduced risk of infection at surgical sites. This meta-analysis was conducted to provide an updated assessment of the relative benefits and risks of MI-TLIF versus O-TLIF. Methods: Electronic searches were performed using six databases from their inception to December 2014. Relevant studies comparing MI-TLIF and O-TLIF were included. Data were extracted and analysed according to predefined clinical end points. Results: There was no significant difference in operation time noted between MI-TLIF and O-TLIF cohorts. The median intraoperative blood loss for MI-TLIF was significantly lower than O-TLIF (median: 177 vs 461 mL; (weighted mean difference) WMD, −256.23; 95 % CI −351.35, −161.1; P < 0.00001). Infection rates were significantly lower in the minimally invasive cohort (1.2 vs 4.6 %; relative risk (RR), 0.27; 95 %, 0.14, 0.53; I2 = 0 %; P = 0.0001). VAS back pain scores were significantly lower in the MI-TLIF group compared to O-TLIF (WMD, −0.41; 95 % CI −0.76, −0.06; I2 = 96 %; P < 0.00001). Postoperative ODI scores were also significantly lower in the minimally invasive cohort (WMD, −2.21; 95 % CI −4.26, −0.15; I2 = 93 %; P = 0.04). Conclusions: In summary, the present systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that MI-TLIF appears to be a safe and efficacious approach compared to O-TLIF. MI-TLIF is associated with lower blood loss and infection rates in patients, albeit at the risk of higher radiation exposure for the surgical team. The long-term relative merits require further validation in prospective, randomized studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1017-1030
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Spine Journal
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 7 May 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Degenerative
  • Lumbar
  • Minimally invasive
  • Spine
  • TLIF
  • Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this