Minimum nodal yield in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Defining the standard of care in a multicenter international pooled validation study

Ardalan Ebrahimi*, Jonathan R. Clark, M. Amit, T. C. Yen, Chun Ta Liao, Luis P. Kowalski, Matthias Kreppel, Claudio R. Cernea, Gideon Bachar, Andrea Bolzoni Villaret, Dan Fliss, Eran Fridman, K. T. Robbins, Jatin P. Shah, Snehal G. Patel, Ziv Gil

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose. There is evidence to suggest that a nodal yield <18 is an independent prognostic factor in patients with clinically node negative (cN0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with elective neck dissection (END). We sought to evaluate this hypothesis with external validation and to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions. Patients and Methods. We analyzed pooled individual data from 1,567 patients treated at nine comprehensive cancer centers worldwide between 1970 and 2011. Nodal yield was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by study center, and adjusted for age, sex, pathological T and N stage, margin status, extracapsular nodal spread, time period of primary treatment, and adjuvant therapy. Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were used to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions. Results. In multivariable analyses of patients undergoing selective neck dissection, nodal yield <18 was associated with reduced overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.69; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.22-2.34; p = 0.002] and disease-specific survival (HR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.21-2.91; p = 0.005), and increased risk of locoregional recurrence (HR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.04-2.26; p = 0.032). Despite significant differences between institutions in terms of patient clinicopathological factors, nodal yield, and outcomes, random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated no evidence of heterogeneity between centers in regards to the impact of nodal yield on disease-specific survival (p = 0.663; I2 statistic = 0). Conclusion. Our data confirm that nodal yield is a robust independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing END for cN0 oral SCC, and may be applied irrespective of the underlying patient population and treating institution. A minimum adequate lymphadenectomy in this setting should include at least 18 nodes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3049-3055
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume21
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Fingerprint

Cite this