TY - JOUR
T1 - Minimum nodal yield in oral squamous cell carcinoma
T2 - defining the standard of care in a multicenter international pooled validation study
AU - Ebrahimi, Ardalan
AU - Clark, Jonathan R.
AU - Amit, M.
AU - Yen, T. C.
AU - Liao, Chun Ta
AU - Kowalski, Luis P.
AU - Kreppel, Matthias
AU - Cernea, Claudio R.
AU - Bachar, Gideon
AU - Villaret, Andrea Bolzoni
AU - Fliss, Dan
AU - Fridman, Eran
AU - Robbins, K. T.
AU - Shah, Jatin P.
AU - Patel, Snehal G.
AU - Gil, Ziv
PY - 2014/9
Y1 - 2014/9
N2 - Purpose. There is evidence to suggest that a nodal yield <18 is an independent prognostic factor in patients with clinically node negative (cN0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with elective neck dissection (END). We sought to evaluate this hypothesis with external validation and to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions. Patients and Methods. We analyzed pooled individual data from 1,567 patients treated at nine comprehensive cancer centers worldwide between 1970 and 2011. Nodal yield was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by study center, and adjusted for age, sex, pathological T and N stage, margin status, extracapsular nodal spread, time period of primary treatment, and adjuvant therapy. Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were used to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions. Results. In multivariable analyses of patients undergoing selective neck dissection, nodal yield <18 was associated with reduced overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.69; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.22-2.34; p = 0.002] and disease-specific survival (HR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.21-2.91; p = 0.005), and increased risk of locoregional recurrence (HR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.04-2.26; p = 0.032). Despite significant differences between institutions in terms of patient clinicopathological factors, nodal yield, and outcomes, random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated no evidence of heterogeneity between centers in regards to the impact of nodal yield on disease-specific survival (p = 0.663; I2 statistic = 0). Conclusion. Our data confirm that nodal yield is a robust independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing END for cN0 oral SCC, and may be applied irrespective of the underlying patient population and treating institution. A minimum adequate lymphadenectomy in this setting should include at least 18 nodes.
AB - Purpose. There is evidence to suggest that a nodal yield <18 is an independent prognostic factor in patients with clinically node negative (cN0) oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with elective neck dissection (END). We sought to evaluate this hypothesis with external validation and to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions. Patients and Methods. We analyzed pooled individual data from 1,567 patients treated at nine comprehensive cancer centers worldwide between 1970 and 2011. Nodal yield was assessed with Cox proportional hazard models, stratified by study center, and adjusted for age, sex, pathological T and N stage, margin status, extracapsular nodal spread, time period of primary treatment, and adjuvant therapy. Two-stage random-effects meta-analyses were used to investigate for heterogeneity between institutions. Results. In multivariable analyses of patients undergoing selective neck dissection, nodal yield <18 was associated with reduced overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) 1.69; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.22-2.34; p = 0.002] and disease-specific survival (HR 1.88; 95 % CI 1.21-2.91; p = 0.005), and increased risk of locoregional recurrence (HR 1.53; 95 % CI 1.04-2.26; p = 0.032). Despite significant differences between institutions in terms of patient clinicopathological factors, nodal yield, and outcomes, random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated no evidence of heterogeneity between centers in regards to the impact of nodal yield on disease-specific survival (p = 0.663; I2 statistic = 0). Conclusion. Our data confirm that nodal yield is a robust independent prognostic factor in patients undergoing END for cN0 oral SCC, and may be applied irrespective of the underlying patient population and treating institution. A minimum adequate lymphadenectomy in this setting should include at least 18 nodes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906273549&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-014-3702-x
DO - 10.1245/s10434-014-3702-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 24728823
AN - SCOPUS:84906273549
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 21
SP - 3049
EP - 3055
JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology
JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology
IS - 9
ER -