Misplaced Stress on Prosody: A Reply to Black and Byng

Anne Cutler, David Howard, Karalyn E. Patterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent claim by Black and Byng (1986) that lexical access in reading is subject to prosodic constraints is examined and found to be unsupported. The evidence from impaired reading which Black and Byng report is based on poorly controlled stimulus materials and is inadequately analysed and reported. An alternative explanation of their findings is proposed, and new data are reported for which this alternative explanation can account but their model cannot. Finally, their proposal is shown to be theoretically unmotivated and in conflict with evidence from normal reading.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-83
Number of pages17
JournalCognitive Neuropsychology
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Misplaced Stress on Prosody: A Reply to Black and Byng'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this