Abstract
The topic of customer loyalty in financial services is a perennial concern for both theoreticians and practitioners who share an interest in understanding its antecedents and in its prediction. The complex multidimensional causal structure of loyalty and its antecedents has attracted significant attention by researchers although there are still opportunities in developing causal models and in improving their predictive power. In this context, Structural Equation Models (SEM) would appear to be ideally suited, although the published track record of this approach is patchy. In this context, the distinction between formative and reflective approaches to SEM offers the prospect of improving the performance of SEM in modelling customer loyalty. This current empirical study compares the two approaches to modelling customer loyalty and draws some conclusions for SEM methodology. In this study, variety seeking, risk taking behaviour, and resistance to change are tested in explaining loyalty. The combined reflective and formative model was found superior over the purely reflective SEM approach.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Academy of Marketing Annual Conference 2009 Proceedings |
| Place of Publication | Leeds, UK |
| Publisher | Academy of Marketing |
| Pages | 1-13 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
| Event | Academy of Marketing Conference (2009) - Leeds Duration: 7 Jul 2009 → 9 Jul 2009 |
Conference
| Conference | Academy of Marketing Conference (2009) |
|---|---|
| City | Leeds |
| Period | 7/07/09 → 9/07/09 |
Keywords
- Share of wallet
- customer loyalty
- formative & reflective measurements
- risk taking
- variety seeking
- resistance to change
- structural equation modelling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Modelling loyalty in retail banking using formative and reflective approaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver