Models of Chinese reading: review and analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Our understanding of the cognitive processes involved in reading has been advanced by computational models that simulate those processes (e.g., see Reichle, 2015). Unfortunately, most of these models have been developed to explain the reading of English and other alphabetic languages, with relatively fewer efforts to examine whether or not the assumptions of these models also explain what has been learned from other languages and, in particular, non‐alphabetic writing systems like Chinese (e.g., see Li, Zang, Liversedge, & Pollatsek, 2015). In this article, we will review those computational models that have been developed to explain the reading of Chinese, with the goal of comparing their theoretical assumptions to those of models that explain the reading of English. Our analysis indicates that there are both points of convergence and divergence between the theoretical assumptions of Chinese versus English models, suggesting that the cognitive systems supporting reading may be differentially influenced by features of the languages and/or writing systems, or that certain theoretical assumptions developed to explain the reading of one language might be adapted to explain the reading of others.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1154-1165
Number of pages12
JournalCognitive Science
Volume42
Issue numberS4
Early online date13 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Reading
Language
Cognitive systems

Cite this

@article{8b32cc89fd6f4fa18079c828b7d567bf,
title = "Models of Chinese reading: review and analysis",
abstract = "Our understanding of the cognitive processes involved in reading has been advanced by computational models that simulate those processes (e.g., see Reichle, 2015). Unfortunately, most of these models have been developed to explain the reading of English and other alphabetic languages, with relatively fewer efforts to examine whether or not the assumptions of these models also explain what has been learned from other languages and, in particular, non‐alphabetic writing systems like Chinese (e.g., see Li, Zang, Liversedge, & Pollatsek, 2015). In this article, we will review those computational models that have been developed to explain the reading of Chinese, with the goal of comparing their theoretical assumptions to those of models that explain the reading of English. Our analysis indicates that there are both points of convergence and divergence between the theoretical assumptions of Chinese versus English models, suggesting that the cognitive systems supporting reading may be differentially influenced by features of the languages and/or writing systems, or that certain theoretical assumptions developed to explain the reading of one language might be adapted to explain the reading of others.",
keywords = "Chinese, computational models, reading, sentence processing, word identification",
author = "Erik Reichle and Lili Yu",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/cogs.12564",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1154--1165",
journal = "Cognitive Science",
issn = "0364-0213",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell, Wiley",
number = "S4",

}

Models of Chinese reading : review and analysis. / Reichle, Erik; Yu, Lili.

In: Cognitive Science, Vol. 42, No. S4, 06.2018, p. 1154-1165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Models of Chinese reading

T2 - Cognitive Science

AU - Reichle,Erik

AU - Yu,Lili

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - Our understanding of the cognitive processes involved in reading has been advanced by computational models that simulate those processes (e.g., see Reichle, 2015). Unfortunately, most of these models have been developed to explain the reading of English and other alphabetic languages, with relatively fewer efforts to examine whether or not the assumptions of these models also explain what has been learned from other languages and, in particular, non‐alphabetic writing systems like Chinese (e.g., see Li, Zang, Liversedge, & Pollatsek, 2015). In this article, we will review those computational models that have been developed to explain the reading of Chinese, with the goal of comparing their theoretical assumptions to those of models that explain the reading of English. Our analysis indicates that there are both points of convergence and divergence between the theoretical assumptions of Chinese versus English models, suggesting that the cognitive systems supporting reading may be differentially influenced by features of the languages and/or writing systems, or that certain theoretical assumptions developed to explain the reading of one language might be adapted to explain the reading of others.

AB - Our understanding of the cognitive processes involved in reading has been advanced by computational models that simulate those processes (e.g., see Reichle, 2015). Unfortunately, most of these models have been developed to explain the reading of English and other alphabetic languages, with relatively fewer efforts to examine whether or not the assumptions of these models also explain what has been learned from other languages and, in particular, non‐alphabetic writing systems like Chinese (e.g., see Li, Zang, Liversedge, & Pollatsek, 2015). In this article, we will review those computational models that have been developed to explain the reading of Chinese, with the goal of comparing their theoretical assumptions to those of models that explain the reading of English. Our analysis indicates that there are both points of convergence and divergence between the theoretical assumptions of Chinese versus English models, suggesting that the cognitive systems supporting reading may be differentially influenced by features of the languages and/or writing systems, or that certain theoretical assumptions developed to explain the reading of one language might be adapted to explain the reading of others.

KW - Chinese

KW - computational models

KW - reading

KW - sentence processing

KW - word identification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033680437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cogs.12564

DO - 10.1111/cogs.12564

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 1154

EP - 1165

JO - Cognitive Science

JF - Cognitive Science

SN - 0364-0213

IS - S4

ER -