TY - JOUR
T1 - Models of confabulation
T2 - A critical review and a new framework
AU - Metcalf, Kasey
AU - Langdon, Robyn
AU - Coltheart, Max
PY - 2007/2/1
Y1 - 2007/2/1
N2 - Confabulation can be defined as statements or actions that involve distortions of memories. This paper reviews current theories of confabulation focusing on source monitoring, temporal-context, and retrieval theories. The attributes and criticisms of these three models are discussed. From this review, a three-factor cognitive-neuropsychological framework is proposed, which can be used to explain the variable symptoms of confabulation. The framework takes its basis from the Langdon and Coltheart (2000a, 2000b) cognitive model of delusional belief formation. The model suggests that two deficits are likely in most cases of confabulation - an executive control retrieval deficit and an evaluation deficit. It also takes into consideration how the general organization of the autobiographical memory store and a person's individual emotional/motivational biases can influence confabulatory symptoms and content. This is an overarching framework that can be used to model confabulations, and it builds upon links between delusions and confabulation.
AB - Confabulation can be defined as statements or actions that involve distortions of memories. This paper reviews current theories of confabulation focusing on source monitoring, temporal-context, and retrieval theories. The attributes and criticisms of these three models are discussed. From this review, a three-factor cognitive-neuropsychological framework is proposed, which can be used to explain the variable symptoms of confabulation. The framework takes its basis from the Langdon and Coltheart (2000a, 2000b) cognitive model of delusional belief formation. The model suggests that two deficits are likely in most cases of confabulation - an executive control retrieval deficit and an evaluation deficit. It also takes into consideration how the general organization of the autobiographical memory store and a person's individual emotional/motivational biases can influence confabulatory symptoms and content. This is an overarching framework that can be used to model confabulations, and it builds upon links between delusions and confabulation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250637191&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/02643290600694901
DO - 10.1080/02643290600694901
M3 - Review article
C2 - 18416482
AN - SCOPUS:34250637191
SN - 0264-3294
VL - 24
SP - 23
EP - 47
JO - Cognitive Neuropsychology
JF - Cognitive Neuropsychology
IS - 1
ER -