Abstract
Aim: Investigations into 14 suspected pathology sample identification errors and mix-ups were performed, as a service for several public hospital and private laboratories, from 2005 to 2007. Methods: Analyses were performed with the forensic ABI Identifiler kit of 16 microsatellites 15 autosomal and amelogenin on DNA from paraffin-embedded tissues or blood specimens and compared to independently verified single or multiple patient samples. Results: Of 23 unique patient specimens referred for sample integrity confirmation because of pathologist, clinician or patient concern, six 26.1 were demonstrated to be discordant, indicating that specimen identification errors or mix-ups had occurred. Conclusions: Due to their great sensitivity and high discrimination power, forensic identity multiplex systems using either microsatellites or single nucleotide polymorphisms SNPs can resolve concerns about pathology specimen identity and integrity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 280-283 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Pathology |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Human identification
- Microsatellite
- Sample integrity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Molecular confirmation of pathological specimen integrity in Australasia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver