Abstract
In recent years, the Australian regulator has taken enforcement action against reporting entities for failure to comply with the risk-based approach to anti-money laundering (‘AML’) and counterterrorism financing (‘CTF’), resulting in massive penalties and other damaging repercussions. These actions have highlighted the need for reporting entities to identify and respond to the AML/CTF risks posed by their businesses even more than before. This paper aims to provide a critical analysis of how the concept of risk operates within Australia’s AML/CTF regulatory framework and to suggest ways of enhancing the efficiency of compliance with the global standard. Against the backdrop of these enforcement actions and their pronounced implications, this article offers an original and interdisciplinary contribution by thoroughly exploring the subtle nuances of how risk, as a pivotal concept, orchestrates the course of AML/CTF regulatory endeavours within Australia. By meticulous analysis and well-reasoned suggestions, this article takes on the mantle of not only investigating the status quo but also envisioning pathways for augmenting compliance efficiencies in harmony with global standards. In doing so, it navigates uncharted avenues within the legal domain, casting a spotlight on the intrinsic symbiosis between risk comprehension and regulatory adeptness.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 31-60 |
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | Monash University Law Review |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 14 Aug 2024 |
Keywords
- Anti-money laundering
- Global regime
- Counter-terrorist financing
- Risk-based approach
- Rule-based approach
- Risk management
- Financial action taskforce
- Compliance