Monitoring health IT integration - The effect of an EMR on laboratory service timeliness across six Australian hospitals

Andrew Georgiou*, Elia Vecellio, Ling Li, Alex Eigenstetter, Roger Wilson, George Toouli, Johanna I. Westbrook

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalConference paper

42 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) incorporates computerised provider order entry systems which allow clinicians to order diagnostic tests electronically, thus eliminating the need for cumbersome handwritten orders. In many situations the EMR relies on a manual transition of information across systems (e.g., integration with the Laboratory Information System). This study, based in a laboratory setting requiring such a transition across systems, aimed to compare the data entry time (from when a specimen arrives in the Central Specimen Reception [CSR] area of the laboratory, to when it is forwarded on for processing), along with a laboratory turnaround time (TAT) (from the time a specimen is received to the time a verified result is issued) for paper and EMR orders, for two high volume tests, across six hospitals. Results showed that the median data entry time for all hospitals combined, was three minutes shorter for EMR entered orders than paper orders. This difference was consistent and significant for Electrolytes, Urea, Creatinine (EUC) and Automated Differential (including full blood count) tests in 2010 and 2011. These decreases contributed to significantly lower median Laboratory TATs for EMR orders (for EUC tests the difference in medians was 12 minutes in 2010 and six minutes in 2011; for Automated Differential tests, the difference was four minutes in 2010 and two minutes in 2011).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)955-959
Number of pages5
JournalStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Volume205
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes
Event25th European Medical Informatics Conference, MIE 2014 - Istanbul, Turkey
Duration: 31 Aug 20143 Sep 2014

    Fingerprint

Bibliographical note

Copyright the Publisher 2014. Version archived for private and non-commercial use with the permission of the author/s and according to publisher conditions. For further rights please contact the publisher.

Cite this