Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis

Philip M. Grove, Kevin R. Brooks, Barton L. Anderson, Barbara J. Gillam

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Howard and Duke [Howard, I. P. & Duke, P. A. (2003). Monocular transparency generates quantitative depth. Vision Research, 43, 2615-2621] recently proposed a new source of binocular information they claim is used to recover depth in stereoscopic displays. They argued that these displays lack conventional disparity and that the metrical depth experienced results from transparency rather than occlusion relations. Using a variety of modified versions of their stimuli, we show here that the conditions for transparency are not required to elicit the depth experienced in their stereograms. We demonstrate that quantitative and precise depth depended not on the presence of transparency but horizontal contours of the same contrast polarity. Depth was attenuated, particularly at larger target offsets, when horizontal contours had opposite contrast polarity for at least a portion of their length. We also show that a demonstration they used to control for the role of horizontal contours can be understood with previously identified mechanisms involved in the computations associated with stereoscopic occlusion. These results imply that the findings reported by Howard and Duke can be understood with mechanisms responsible for the computation of binocular disparity and stereoscopic occlusion.

LanguageEnglish
Pages1695-1705
Number of pages11
JournalVision Research
Volume46
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Vision Disparity
Depth Perception
Research

Bibliographical note

An erratum exists for this article and can be found in Vision Research, vol. 46, issue 18, pp. 3041-3053. DOIs: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.013 (p. 3041) and 10.1016/j.visres.2006.05.003 (pp. 3042-3053)

Cite this

Grove, Philip M. ; Brooks, Kevin R. ; Anderson, Barton L. ; Gillam, Barbara J. / Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis. In: Vision Research. 2006 ; Vol. 46, No. 10. pp. 1695-1705.
@article{7765beb79f86409e8f4432b8ae513df5,
title = "Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis",
abstract = "Howard and Duke [Howard, I. P. & Duke, P. A. (2003). Monocular transparency generates quantitative depth. Vision Research, 43, 2615-2621] recently proposed a new source of binocular information they claim is used to recover depth in stereoscopic displays. They argued that these displays lack conventional disparity and that the metrical depth experienced results from transparency rather than occlusion relations. Using a variety of modified versions of their stimuli, we show here that the conditions for transparency are not required to elicit the depth experienced in their stereograms. We demonstrate that quantitative and precise depth depended not on the presence of transparency but horizontal contours of the same contrast polarity. Depth was attenuated, particularly at larger target offsets, when horizontal contours had opposite contrast polarity for at least a portion of their length. We also show that a demonstration they used to control for the role of horizontal contours can be understood with previously identified mechanisms involved in the computations associated with stereoscopic occlusion. These results imply that the findings reported by Howard and Duke can be understood with mechanisms responsible for the computation of binocular disparity and stereoscopic occlusion.",
author = "Grove, {Philip M.} and Brooks, {Kevin R.} and Anderson, {Barton L.} and Gillam, {Barbara J.}",
note = "An erratum exists for this article and can be found in Vision Research, vol. 46, issue 18, pp. 3041-3053. DOIs: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.013 (p. 3041) and 10.1016/j.visres.2006.05.003 (pp. 3042-3053)",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "1695--1705",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "10",

}

Grove, PM, Brooks, KR, Anderson, BL & Gillam, BJ 2006, 'Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis', Vision Research, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1695-1705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.006

Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis. / Grove, Philip M.; Brooks, Kevin R.; Anderson, Barton L.; Gillam, Barbara J.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 46, No. 10, 05.2006, p. 1695-1705.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Monocular transparency and unpaired stereopsis

AU - Grove, Philip M.

AU - Brooks, Kevin R.

AU - Anderson, Barton L.

AU - Gillam, Barbara J.

N1 - An erratum exists for this article and can be found in Vision Research, vol. 46, issue 18, pp. 3041-3053. DOIs: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.013 (p. 3041) and 10.1016/j.visres.2006.05.003 (pp. 3042-3053)

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Howard and Duke [Howard, I. P. & Duke, P. A. (2003). Monocular transparency generates quantitative depth. Vision Research, 43, 2615-2621] recently proposed a new source of binocular information they claim is used to recover depth in stereoscopic displays. They argued that these displays lack conventional disparity and that the metrical depth experienced results from transparency rather than occlusion relations. Using a variety of modified versions of their stimuli, we show here that the conditions for transparency are not required to elicit the depth experienced in their stereograms. We demonstrate that quantitative and precise depth depended not on the presence of transparency but horizontal contours of the same contrast polarity. Depth was attenuated, particularly at larger target offsets, when horizontal contours had opposite contrast polarity for at least a portion of their length. We also show that a demonstration they used to control for the role of horizontal contours can be understood with previously identified mechanisms involved in the computations associated with stereoscopic occlusion. These results imply that the findings reported by Howard and Duke can be understood with mechanisms responsible for the computation of binocular disparity and stereoscopic occlusion.

AB - Howard and Duke [Howard, I. P. & Duke, P. A. (2003). Monocular transparency generates quantitative depth. Vision Research, 43, 2615-2621] recently proposed a new source of binocular information they claim is used to recover depth in stereoscopic displays. They argued that these displays lack conventional disparity and that the metrical depth experienced results from transparency rather than occlusion relations. Using a variety of modified versions of their stimuli, we show here that the conditions for transparency are not required to elicit the depth experienced in their stereograms. We demonstrate that quantitative and precise depth depended not on the presence of transparency but horizontal contours of the same contrast polarity. Depth was attenuated, particularly at larger target offsets, when horizontal contours had opposite contrast polarity for at least a portion of their length. We also show that a demonstration they used to control for the role of horizontal contours can be understood with previously identified mechanisms involved in the computations associated with stereoscopic occlusion. These results imply that the findings reported by Howard and Duke can be understood with mechanisms responsible for the computation of binocular disparity and stereoscopic occlusion.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745270013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31344433518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.013

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.006

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 1695

EP - 1705

JO - Vision Research

T2 - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 10

ER -