Abstract
Monuments and statues are forms of commemoration. They typically pay tribute to people or events and aim to serve as a permanent marker, a link between present and past generations, committing them to memory and assigning them with importance and meaning. While commemorations can be beneficial in terms of recognising a legacy of the past and helping foster relationships between opposing groups, they can also be divisive and painful, failing to acknowledge other dimensions of historical fact and further hardening the boundaries between groups in conflict. Essentially, what we choose to commemorate reflects what we as a society actually value. This paper focuses on the unsettled fates of the Captain Cook statue that stands with prominence in Hyde Park, Warrane, and other colonial monuments in Australia. It also discusses the emotionality surrounding such commemorations. We question whether Cook’s actual achievements constitute the notoriety that has been bestowed upon him. A range of commentators have put forward ideas around what to do about the Cook statue which we discuss while also considering what the future might look like if the truth of colonial history is known and open conversations can be had.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 62-81 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Thesis Eleven |
Volume | 169 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 8 Feb 2022 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2022 |
Keywords
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people
- Captain Cook
- colonial monuments
- emotion
- Indigenous
- statues