Moral risk and humane farming

Fayna Fuentes López*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Humane farming, that is, a husbandry system where animals do not suffer, either during their lives, or at the time of their killing, has been advertised as an ethical alternative to the horrors of factory farming. Although it could be argued that such a system does not currently exist, we ought to determine whether this is a morally desirable end to strive for. My objective is to assess one of the utilitarian arguments used in the debate about humane farming. In particular, I am interested in whether we have risk-related reasons to argue against the implementation of this practice. I will argue, against de Lazari-Radek and Singer, that considerations of moral risk should lead us to reject the practice of humane farming. In doing so, I will engage with arguments dealing with both the badness of animal death and the value of coming into existence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)463-476
Number of pages14
JournalUtilitas
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

Cite this