Morphemes in their place

Evidence for position-specific identification of suffixes

Davide Crepaldi*, Kathleen Rastle, Colin J. Davis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)


Previous research strongly suggests that morphologically complex words are recognized in terms of their constituent morphemes. A question thus arises as to how the recognition system codes for morpheme position within words, given that it needs to distinguish morphological anagrams like overhang and hangover. The present study focused specifically on whether the recognition of suffixes occurs in a position-specific fashion. Experiments 1 and 2 revealed that morphologically complex nonwords (gasful) are rejected more slowly than orthographic controls (gasfil) but that the same interference effect is not present when the morphemic constituents are reversed (fulgas vs. filgas). Experiment 3 went further in demonstrating that reversing the morphemes within words (e.g., nesskind) does not yield morpheme interference effects against orthographic controls (e.g., nusskind). These results strongly suggest that suffix identification is position specific, which imposes important constraints on the further development of models of morphological processing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)312-321
Number of pages10
JournalMemory and Cognition
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Morphemes in their place: Evidence for position-specific identification of suffixes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this