Morphological and physiological correlates of hybrid parthenogenesis

Michael Kearney*, Richard Shine

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)
13 Downloads (Pure)


Asexuality frequently evolves in association with hybridity and polyploidy. The phenotypic consequences of this association must be understood before we can fully appreciate the reason for the short-term success, and the long-term failure, of asexual genetic systems. Parthenogenetic forms within the Australian gecko complex Heteronotia binoei are triploid hybrids and overlap geographically with both of their parental taxa as well as another sexual lineage. We compared nine morphological and nine physiological traits in wild-caught adult sexual and asexual individuals as well as their captive-bred progeny across a 1,200-km latitudinal gradient. Genome dosage effects were apparent in that the parthenogens were most phenotypically similar to the parental form for which they had a double dosage. Physiological differences between parthenogens and sexuals were often in the opposite direction of that expected under heterosis. Sympatric populations of sexual and parthenogenetic H. binoei differ in ecologically significant phenotypic traits, possibly reducing niche overlap. In keeping with the Red Queen hypothesis, parthenogenetic H. binoei had more ectoparasitic mites than did sexuals in some regions. Lizards with high mite loads also had high rates of evaporative water loss, suggesting a direct link between phenotypic traits and vulnerability to parasites.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)803-813
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2004
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

© 2004 by The University of Chicago.


  • Ectoparasites
  • Hybridity
  • Morphology
  • Parthenogenesis
  • Physiology
  • Polyploidy


Dive into the research topics of 'Morphological and physiological correlates of hybrid parthenogenesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this