Motivational interviewing prior to cognitive behavioural treatment for social anxiety disorder: a randomised controlled trial

Lorna Peters, Mia Romano, Yulisha Byrow, Lauren McLellan, Keila Brockveld, Andrew Baillie, Jonathan Gaston, Ronald Rapee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background
We examined whether providing three sessions of treatment based on motivational interviewing (MI) prior to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) improved outcomes.

Methods
Participants diagnosed with SAD (N = 186) were randomly allocated to receive three sessions of MI (MI+CBT; n = 85) or supportive counselling (SC+CBT; n = 101) prior to a 12-week group CBT program. Assessments occurred at baseline, after preparatory treatment, after CBT, and at 6-months follow-up. Outcomes were expectations for change, number of CBT sessions attended, self- and clinician-rated CBT homework completion, and self- and clinician-rated social anxiety severity.

Results
Conditions did not differ significantly on expectations for change, number of CBT sessions attended, or clinician-rated homework completion. Self-rated homework completion was greater in MI+CBT than in SC+CBT. Change over time in social anxiety severity did not differ between conditions overall, however, this outcome was significantly moderated by two variables; those in MI+CBT, as compared to SC+CBT, showed significantly poorer outcomes on self-reported social anxiety severity if they were higher in change readiness and significantly better outcomes on clinician-rated social anxiety severity if they were higher in functional impairment.

Limitations
Although therapists in MI sessions were rated as behaving more consistently with MI than therapists in SC sessions, some MI consistent behaviors occurred in the SC sessions.

Conclusions
Addition of a MI-based discussion prior to evidence-based CBT appears to benefit people with SAD who have high functional impairment but may interfere with outcomes for those higher in readiness for change.
LanguageEnglish
Pages70-78
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Affective Disorders
Volume256
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

Motivational Interviewing
Cognitive Therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials
Anxiety
Social Phobia

Cite this

@article{05462699f0424e0c8abd1dd202004b3f,
title = "Motivational interviewing prior to cognitive behavioural treatment for social anxiety disorder: a randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "BackgroundWe examined whether providing three sessions of treatment based on motivational interviewing (MI) prior to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) improved outcomes.MethodsParticipants diagnosed with SAD (N = 186) were randomly allocated to receive three sessions of MI (MI+CBT; n = 85) or supportive counselling (SC+CBT; n = 101) prior to a 12-week group CBT program. Assessments occurred at baseline, after preparatory treatment, after CBT, and at 6-months follow-up. Outcomes were expectations for change, number of CBT sessions attended, self- and clinician-rated CBT homework completion, and self- and clinician-rated social anxiety severity.ResultsConditions did not differ significantly on expectations for change, number of CBT sessions attended, or clinician-rated homework completion. Self-rated homework completion was greater in MI+CBT than in SC+CBT. Change over time in social anxiety severity did not differ between conditions overall, however, this outcome was significantly moderated by two variables; those in MI+CBT, as compared to SC+CBT, showed significantly poorer outcomes on self-reported social anxiety severity if they were higher in change readiness and significantly better outcomes on clinician-rated social anxiety severity if they were higher in functional impairment.LimitationsAlthough therapists in MI sessions were rated as behaving more consistently with MI than therapists in SC sessions, some MI consistent behaviors occurred in the SC sessions.ConclusionsAddition of a MI-based discussion prior to evidence-based CBT appears to benefit people with SAD who have high functional impairment but may interfere with outcomes for those higher in readiness for change.",
keywords = "social anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioural treatment, motivational interviewing",
author = "Lorna Peters and Mia Romano and Yulisha Byrow and Lauren McLellan and Keila Brockveld and Andrew Baillie and Jonathan Gaston and Ronald Rapee",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.042",
language = "English",
volume = "256",
pages = "70--78",
journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",
issn = "0165-0327",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Motivational interviewing prior to cognitive behavioural treatment for social anxiety disorder : a randomised controlled trial. / Peters, Lorna; Romano, Mia; Byrow, Yulisha; McLellan, Lauren; Brockveld, Keila; Baillie, Andrew; Gaston, Jonathan; Rapee, Ronald.

In: Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 256, 01.09.2019, p. 70-78.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motivational interviewing prior to cognitive behavioural treatment for social anxiety disorder

T2 - Journal of Affective Disorders

AU - Peters,Lorna

AU - Romano,Mia

AU - Byrow,Yulisha

AU - McLellan,Lauren

AU - Brockveld,Keila

AU - Baillie,Andrew

AU - Gaston,Jonathan

AU - Rapee,Ronald

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - BackgroundWe examined whether providing three sessions of treatment based on motivational interviewing (MI) prior to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) improved outcomes.MethodsParticipants diagnosed with SAD (N = 186) were randomly allocated to receive three sessions of MI (MI+CBT; n = 85) or supportive counselling (SC+CBT; n = 101) prior to a 12-week group CBT program. Assessments occurred at baseline, after preparatory treatment, after CBT, and at 6-months follow-up. Outcomes were expectations for change, number of CBT sessions attended, self- and clinician-rated CBT homework completion, and self- and clinician-rated social anxiety severity.ResultsConditions did not differ significantly on expectations for change, number of CBT sessions attended, or clinician-rated homework completion. Self-rated homework completion was greater in MI+CBT than in SC+CBT. Change over time in social anxiety severity did not differ between conditions overall, however, this outcome was significantly moderated by two variables; those in MI+CBT, as compared to SC+CBT, showed significantly poorer outcomes on self-reported social anxiety severity if they were higher in change readiness and significantly better outcomes on clinician-rated social anxiety severity if they were higher in functional impairment.LimitationsAlthough therapists in MI sessions were rated as behaving more consistently with MI than therapists in SC sessions, some MI consistent behaviors occurred in the SC sessions.ConclusionsAddition of a MI-based discussion prior to evidence-based CBT appears to benefit people with SAD who have high functional impairment but may interfere with outcomes for those higher in readiness for change.

AB - BackgroundWe examined whether providing three sessions of treatment based on motivational interviewing (MI) prior to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) improved outcomes.MethodsParticipants diagnosed with SAD (N = 186) were randomly allocated to receive three sessions of MI (MI+CBT; n = 85) or supportive counselling (SC+CBT; n = 101) prior to a 12-week group CBT program. Assessments occurred at baseline, after preparatory treatment, after CBT, and at 6-months follow-up. Outcomes were expectations for change, number of CBT sessions attended, self- and clinician-rated CBT homework completion, and self- and clinician-rated social anxiety severity.ResultsConditions did not differ significantly on expectations for change, number of CBT sessions attended, or clinician-rated homework completion. Self-rated homework completion was greater in MI+CBT than in SC+CBT. Change over time in social anxiety severity did not differ between conditions overall, however, this outcome was significantly moderated by two variables; those in MI+CBT, as compared to SC+CBT, showed significantly poorer outcomes on self-reported social anxiety severity if they were higher in change readiness and significantly better outcomes on clinician-rated social anxiety severity if they were higher in functional impairment.LimitationsAlthough therapists in MI sessions were rated as behaving more consistently with MI than therapists in SC sessions, some MI consistent behaviors occurred in the SC sessions.ConclusionsAddition of a MI-based discussion prior to evidence-based CBT appears to benefit people with SAD who have high functional impairment but may interfere with outcomes for those higher in readiness for change.

KW - social anxiety disorder

KW - cognitive behavioural treatment

KW - motivational interviewing

UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1024111

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067070524&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.042

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.042

M3 - Article

VL - 256

SP - 70

EP - 78

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

SN - 0165-0327

ER -