"Moved on"?

An exploratory study of the Cashless Debit Card and Indigenous mobility

Eve Vincent*, Francis Markham, Elise Klein

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

What is the relationship between the first two trials of the Cashless Debit Card (CDC) and Indigenous mobility? In Ceduna, Vincent conducted ethnographic research into lived experiences of the first CDC trial. In the East Kimberley, Klein conducted 51 structured interviews with people on the card and 37 semi-structured interviews with key informants. Markham used regression analysis of net migration rates at the Statistical Area 2 level to determine whether the CDC trial sites were associated with greater net population loss in 2016 census data than comparable locations. Our exploratory study finds significant local talk of displacement arising from the introduction of the CDC, as well as discussion of short-term trips away from the trial sites being made more difficult. The regression analysis found that the net migration rate was 9.3 per cent points (95% CI: 2.0, 16.5) lower in Ceduna, Wyndham and Kununurra when compared with a group of comparable towns, and 5.2 per cent points (95% CI: 0.9, 9.5) lower when compared with Australia as a whole, meaning that the populations of these towns declined faster than those of comparable towns. Policy effects on mobility should be taken seriously by researchers and policymakers when considering place-based welfare policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-39
Number of pages13
JournalAustralian Journal of Social Issues
Volume55
Issue number1
Early online date27 Nov 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2020

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Aboriginal people
  • cashless debit card
  • income management
  • mobility
  • social welfare policy

Cite this