Multiple states of financially distressed Australian companies: A competing risks model

Nongnit Chancharat, Gary Tian, Pamela Davy, Michael McCrae, Sudhir Lodh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This study examines the determinants of multiple states of financial distress by applying a competing-risks model. It investigates the effect of financial ratios, market-based variables and company-specific variables, including company age, size and squared size on three different states of corporate financial distress: active companies; distressed external administration companies; and distressed takeover, merger or acquisition companies. A sample of 1,081 publicly listed Australian non-financial companies over the period 1989 to 2005 using a competing-risks model is used to determine the possible differences in the factors of entering various states of financial distress. It is found that specifically, distressed external administration companies have a higher leverage, lower past excess returns and a larger size; while distressed takeover, merger or acquisition companies have a lower leverage, a higher capital utilisation efficiency and a larger size compared to active companies. Comparing the results from both the single-risk model and the competing-risks model reveals the need to distinguish between financial distress states.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-44
Number of pages18
JournalAustralasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple states of financially distressed Australian companies: A competing risks model'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this